Babbling Deep State bimbo Haley an embarrassment to all Americans, spouting ludicrous kindergarten lies and transparent, recycled Bush/Cheney era propaganda
STRATEGIC CULTURE FOUNDATION
By Peter Korzun
04/15/2018
Is the US sincere in its fury about the alleged chemical attack in Syria? If this were more than theatrics, it would repent of its role in the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war.
More than 30 years ago the Iraqi regime was regularly delivering devastating chemical barrages against Iran. The US
knew all along that Saddam Hussein, the Iraqi leader at the time, had been using mustard gas and sarin since 1983. Roughly 20,000 Iranian troops were killed by chemical weapons (CW) in that war. No emergency UN Security Council meetings were convened, no warships capable of striking land targets with cruise missiles rushed toward Iraqi shores, no belligerent statements were issued, and no sustained military operations were announced.
Donald Rumsfeld, then special envoy to the Middle East, visited Baghdad in 1983 to
shake hands with Saddam Hussein. It was the US and only the US that
protected Iraq in the UN against Iran’s charges of CW use. The 1925 Geneva Protocol states that the signatories are to induce other states not to use CW.
 |
Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam |
In 1988, the Iraqi regime killed 5,000 of its own citizens in Halabja, Iraqi Kurdistan. The US sought to obscure Baghdad’s responsibility by
falsely accusing Tehran, despite the fact that Iran did not possess CW.
 |
McCain's FSA "rebels"with CIA supplied chemical weapons in Aleppo |
The US never stopped working on its
biological programs. It operates
25 bio-labs around the world in violation of the
UN Biological Weapons Convention. Russia is concerned about the fact that the US
has bioweapons programs in place near its borders in Ukraine and Georgia. A leak could lead to mass epidemics that would spread to Russia. No borders exist for killer insects.
No statement coming out of Foggy Bottom has ever declared that the US government is sorry for its multiple violations of international agreements, universally accepted norms of conduct, or for the people who have died or suffered as a result of its misdeeds. Perhaps American diplomats see nothing “horrifying” here.
 |
CNN fake news CIA shills spew ludicrous lies and bogus propaganda on concocted Douma "gas attack" |
The State Department fails to explain why a multinational invasion of Syria could be justified by something that might prove a hoax. Besides, no one has proved that anything like a CW attack took place in Douma at all. Should multinational forces invade the US because of its violations of international law? Could anyone in his right mind believe the US is really worried about the Syrian civilians who allegedly suffered as a result of the attack it says has taken place?
Last year, it took the US military about 48 hours
to kill 100 civilians in Raqqa. One thousand eight hundred civilians overall lost their lives over the course of the US-led offensive to oust Islamic State fighters during that operation. There was no State Department comment on what happened. Were those civilians different from the ones in Douma?
 |
Former Fox "News" fake blond weather girl Heather Nauert now heads up State Department propaganda machine |
State Department Spokeswoman Heather Nauert
believes Russia bears responsibility for the CW attack because it “shields” Syria. By doing so, it “has breached its commitments to the United Nations.” She has a lot of nerve saying that, given all the numerous violations and illegal activities her country conducts practically in broad daylight. People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.
This news bureau contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.