Saturday, May 13, 2017

NATO To Boost Military Presence In Afghanistan Again

Bush, Cheney, Obama are responsible for each and every U.S. military death in Afghanistan, a failed state invaded under bogus pretences and it is now the responsibility of President Trump - as he promised - to END IT    

By Alex Gorka

According to NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, the alliance is again considering boosting its troop strength in Afghanistan. A decision on the possible troop increase is expected to be made by June. The timeframe of the deployments can also be lengthened. 

When will Americans say enough is enough and
demand and end to this lost war and needless U.S.
military deaths
At present, the bloc deploys a 13,000 strong force in the country, which is losing ground to the Taliban. The US accounts for 8,400 military which are part of the NATO contingent.

After the departure of most foreign military from Afghanistan in 2015, the Taliban militants began to expand the territory under their control. 

The prospects for progress in Afghanistan are dim at best. The situation may destabilize dramatically in the near future. The administration in Kabul lacks unity while the clout of regional leaders and warlords is growing. 

According to SIGAR, a US watchdog organization issuing reports on the situation in Afghanistan for the US Congress, the official authorities in Kabul controlled slightly more than half of the country's territory. 

Bush and Obama must be held responsible and accountable
for each and every U.S military death in Afghanistan and Iraq
Approximately, 59.7 percent of the 407 districts were under Afghan government control or influence as of February 20, 2017, showing a slight 2.5 percentage point increase from November 2016. 

The SIGAR April 30 quarterly report says "The number of districts under insurgent control or influence also increased by four this quarter to 45 districts in 15 Afghan provinces" showing a slight increase in the number of the country’s total districts under insurgent control or influence from about 10 percent to 11.1 percent.

The Taliban-led insurgency in Afghanistan has continued to inflict "shockingly high" casualties on government forces and brought more territory under its control or influence. About 6,785 Afghan soldiers and police personnel were killed while another 11,777 were wounded in the first 11 months of 2016. 

The Afghan government has not provided the US military with data for the last seven weeks of that year.

Proven useless, corrupt, untrainable:  The Afghan army

The fighting has also inflicted heavy losses among civilians. Conflict-related civilian casualties stood at more than 11,400, including around 3,500 deaths in 2016, according to the United Nations. The UN mission in Afghanistan documented the deaths of more than 700 civilians in the first quarter of 2017. The continued deepening and geographic spread of the conflict has prompted a 13% increase in the number of people in need of humanitarian assistance in 2017, now 9.3 million.

In February, General John Nicholson, commander of US forces in Afghanistan, testified at the Senate Armed Services Committee saying "we're in a stalemate." He said there was a "shortfall of a few thousand" troops. Last month, the US dropped its largest non-nuclear bomb – an 11-ton "mother of all bombs" – on the Islamic State position in the eastern Nangarhar province with Marines returning to the Helmand province attacked by Taliban.

"We're in a stalemate."... Well no shit, Nicholson

The Taliban has also been steadily making territorial gains with Afghan security forces slowly retreating. In late April, the group carried out one of its deadliest attacks since 2001, killing around 140 soldiers at an Afghan military base outside the northern city of Mazar-i-Sharif. On April 28, the Taliban announced the start of its annual "spring offensive." The group captured a district in Afghanistan's northern Kunduz province, the second area to fall to it a week after the offensive was declared.

Facing a desperate situation, the Afghan government turns to Russia for help. Last month, it asked Moscow for assistance in supplies, services and training for the military and police. "We discussed this at the Russian Foreign Ministry and asked to consider possible service support in Afghanistan, as well as material supplies and training for the armed forces and the police," said Ashraf Haidari, head of the Afghan Foreign Ministry's Department for Policies and Strategic Planning.

The diplomat paid special attention to servicing of Russian-made helicopters used by the Afghan Air Force. The deal faces snags on the way due to the sanctions imposed on Russia in 2014. As a result, the West and the Afghan government lose while the Taliban and the Islamic State – the terrorist groups operating in Afghanistan – gain.

Beefing up the Afghan government’s defense capability meets the US interests. The United States has eased the sanctions against Russian cooperation with Afghanistan on helicopter maintenance with Russia’s Rosoboronexport, the country’s state agency for exports/imports of defense-related and dual-use products. Like in the case of the Russia-produced RD-180 and RD-181 rocket engines needed to keep afloat its space research program, the US comfortably forgot about anti-Russian punitive measures.

The Afghan officials believe that the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) has a role to play in managing the crisis in the country. The Collective Security Treaty Organization, including Afghanistan, which has observer status of the alliance, has proposed cooperation with NATO on Afghanistan under the flagship of Russia. This initiative was rejected. In April, Russia hosted discussions on Afghanistan aimed at encouraging the Taliban to negotiate with the shaky government in Kabul. Eleven countries took part the Moscow conference, including Afghanistan, China, Iran, Pakistan and India. Former Soviet Central Asian states were invited to attend for the first time. The US rejected the invitation.

Despite all the existing differences, NATO officials have made statements in support of resuming Russia-NATO cooperation in Afghanistan. The parties had cooperated in Afghanistan before the sanctions were imposed and the ties frozen.

Russia’s contribution was significant. Moscow allowed land transit though its territory of non-military freight from NATO and non-NATO ISAF (International Security Assistance Force) countries. NATO used the transit center near Ulyanovsk. The parties implemented a program of common training for the prevention of drug trade in Central Asia. If Russia delivers its aviation equipment to Afghanistan, it will need to train Afghan pilots and navigators. Russia and NATO will be in the same boat involved in logistics supplies and training of Afghan military personnel. The word could be avoided but in practice it means nothing else but cooperation. Want it or not, NATO needs Russia in Afghanistan.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has expressed concern over the situation in the country and called for taking urgent steps to tackle the problem. Many militants operating in the northern Afghan provinces come from the countries of the post-Soviet space. The instability spreads to Central Asia posing a direct threat to Russia’s security as there is a growing risk of extremist attacks on the states allied with Moscow. Fighters with combat experience received in Syria have already been spotted in Uzbekistan’s Fergana Valley. The infiltration of Islamic State into Afghanistan threatens the Russian North Caucasus and the Volga region.

The US-led forces have been fighting in Afghanistan for 16 years in America's longest-ever war. The result: almost half of the country is either contested or under the control of the Taliban. The Islamic State terrorist group is also operating on the Afghan soil now. The situation in Afghanistan cannot be swept under the rug – it’s a burning problem that only a truly international effort can solve. It’s serious enough to top the agenda of the Russia-NATO Council. It could become a starting point on the way of rebuilding the broken relationship.

This news bureau contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.  We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.



The real truth on 9/11 slowly continues to bleed out

Technical experts are mounting major challenges to official U.S. government accounts of how three World Trade Center skyscrapers collapsed in near-freefall after the 9/11 attacks 15 years ago.

Many researchers are focusing especially on the little-known collapse of



The Geopolitics Of The United States, Part 1: The Inevitable Empire

The Empire and the inevitable fall of the Obama criminal regime

STRATFOR Editor’s Note: This installment on the United States, presented in two parts, is the 16th in a series of STRATFOR monographs on the geopolitics of countries influential in world affairs.

Like nearly all of the peoples of North and South America, most Americans are not originally from the territory that became the United States.



Geopolitics Of The United States Part 2: American Identity And The Threats of Tomorrow

A look back at 2011 predictions for the future in order to put events of today into perspective

 photo capitalism_zpsah78uy5p.jpg
We have already discussed in the first part of this analysis how the American geography dooms whoever controls the territory to being a global power, but there are a number of other outcomes that shape what that power will be like. The first and most critical is the impact of that geography on the American mindset.



By Robert S. Finnegan

This e-mail outlines and confirms the acts of espionage against Indonesia and Indonesians by Akiko Makino and the others involved both in Kobe University and in AI Lab at University of Airlangga, Surabaya; Bahasa Indonesia original follows English translation...



UPDATED 01/07/2015 : New Analysis Challenges Tamiflu Efficacy; Hong Kong Corona Virus Outbreak


 photo TAMIFLU_small_zpssojx6okt.jpg

Obama criminals now resulting to biowarfare in quest to destroy Chinese and ASEAN economy; "novel virus substrain" points directly to a Kawaoka / Fouchier / Ernala-Ginting Kobe lab virus weaponized and genetically altered to specifically target and infect the Asian population: Ribavirin...



 photo WHO02_zpsplmhtlpr.jpg
The 5th Estate has just purchased a library on H5N1 "Novel" virus pandemics, there are dozens of PDF and Exel documents we feel will assist you in saving lives following intentional releases of the H5N1 and now MERS viruses; we will begin by printing those that appear to be extremely relevant here: H5N1 Kobe-Kawaoka-Ernala series continues soon with more "Smoking Gun" e-mails from Teridah Ernala to The 5th Estate . . .



By Robert S. Finnegan

On October 12, 2002 the Indonesian island of Bali experienced a terrorist attack that rocked the world. It was unquestionably well-coordinated and executed, the largest in the country's history.