Monday, February 01, 2016

WAYNE MADSEN : Wahhabist Assault On Christians In Malaysia

Saudi apostates now light the fires of sectarian terrorism in ASEAN with an assist from Obama's CIA murderers    

By Wayne Madsen

Saudi Arabia, which has fueled Islamist jihadism through its total support for the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq, while in league with its allies Turkey and Israel, has also threatened the stability of a country far to its east.

Obama kissing ass on Saudi despots
Saudi Arabia, which exports its radical Wahhabist form of Islam around the world, has set its sights on Malaysia, which it would like to see become a sharia law Islamist state in the mold of the neighboring Sultanate of Brunei. The Saudi government is ruled by one of the most radical Wahhabist leaders it has experienced in several decades, King Salman bin Abdulaziz al Saud. However, it is widely known that the elderly Salman suffers from dementia and that the government is actually firmly in the hands of the king’s nephew, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Nayef al Saud. 

The Crown Prince, who is also Interior Minister and directs the Saudi intelligence service, plays a key role in providing money, jihadist recruits, and weapons to the Islamic State and its affiliate terrorist groups in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Somalia, and Libya.

Recently, it was announced by Malaysia’s Attorney General that the Prime Minister of Malaysia, Najib Razak, received $680 million from the coffers of the Saudi royal family. The Attorney General, Mohamed Apandi Ali, a Muslim like Razak, claimed that the prime minister did nothing wrong in accepting what amounted to a Saudi bribe. Razak’s totally-corrupt government is attempting to shut down probes into its finances by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC). Since independence, Malaysia has been governed by the Muslim-dominated United Malays National Organization (UMNO). However, unlike past UMNO governments, the Razak administration has altered the policy of fostering interfaith harmony between Muslims, Christians, Buddhists, and Hindus in the Malaysian federation.

For the Saudis to have paid Razak over a two-third billion-dollar bribe, they expected something in return from the prime minister. But the Saudis never expected their bribe to become public. Thanks to crusading Malaysian journalists and keen prosecutors, it was discovered that the Saudis laundered their payola to Razak via a British Virgin Islands "brass plate" company and then through the Singapore branch of a private Swiss bank. 

The Saudis are notorious for ensuring that their financing of Islamist extremism around the world is accomplished through a myriad of private banks and front companies. And under the direction of John Brennan, a Wahhabist-supporter, the US Central Intelligence Agency has turned a blind eye to Saudi financing of jihadist terrorists from Bosnia-Herzegovina to the southern Philippines.

Spawn of Satan:  John Brennan
What Razak is doing for his Saudi pay-off is turning Malaysia into a Wahhabist-influenced theocratic state like Saudi Arabia.

The first victims of Razak’s policy have been the country’s Christian minority. The Malaysian government is permitting Saudi-financed Wahhabist missionaries to travel throughout peninsular Malaysia and the states of Sarawak and Sabah on Borneo offering cash payments to Christians to convert to Islam. 

Christian pastor Esther Goling, the head of the Sabahan Christian group "Perpaduan Anak Negeri Sabah" (PAN) recently told the Malaysian Insider that "creeping Islamization from the peninsula into Sabah is as clear as day." Goling revealed that the Razak government in Putrajaya is permitting public schools in Sabah to be staffed by Islamist teachers who set about to convert non-Muslim students to Islam. A number of the indigenous and Chinese citizens of Sabah and Sarawak are Christians and the Wahhabist-led effort to convert these groups has been aided and abetted by Malaysian government officials in both states.

In Kelantan state, which is governed by the opposition Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS), the state government pays $2345 to any Muslim cleric who marries a non-Muslim indigenous person and converts him or her to Islam. Muslim clerics are also given a free four-wheel drive vehicle, free housing, and a monthly stipend, all courtesy of the PAS government of Kelantan.

The leader of PAS, Abdul Hadi Awang, recently attacked Christian missionaries in Malaysia, and pointed out the interiors of Sabah and Sarawak as areas where Christian missionaries should not be welcomed. Hadi Awang also said that Christianity, as a religion, had failed in the Western countries and should not be allowed to extend into the remote areas of Sabah and Sarawak. Following the lead of his Saudi Wahhabist masters, Hadi Awang would actually prefer to ban Christian missionaries so that his Wahhabist colleagues can have a monopoly on conversions in the remote jungle areas of eastern Malaysia.

Hadi Awang’s threatening comments, which followed Putrajaya’s attempt to infiltrate public schools with Islamist teachers, also created a firestorm in Sarawak. Sarawak United People’s Party leader Datuk Sebastian Ting declared that the Hadi Awang should be barred from entering Sarawak, a proposal also championed by other Christian, native Dayak, and ethnic Chinese leaders in Sarawak. Ting told the Borneo Post that "The PAS president (Hadi Awang) might have malicious and ill intentions against Christians and against the people of Sarawak and Sabah. Hadi is thus a threat to the harmony and peace of the people of Sarawak and he should not be allowed to enter this state unless and until he publicly retracts his allegations against Christians."

There is but one solution to protect the Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, and animist populations of Sabah and Sarawak from dangerous Wahhabist clerics, activists, jihadists, and other ne’er-do-wells falsely representing Islam. Sabah and Sarawak, which should have a large degree of autonomy from the Muslim-dominated peninsular Malaysia, should become independent of Malaysia and the vestiges of Wahhabism and bought-and-paid for Saudi agents-of-influence like Razak and his ministers in Putrajaya. If Kosovo can be independent because of a faux Serbian Orthodox "threat" against mainly Muslim Kosovars, such should be the case with embattled Christians in Sabah and Sarawak. "Freedom for Sabah and Sarawak" should be the rallying cry of Christians around the world, from Germany and Austria, where Saudi-funded jihadist men pose a rape threat to women on sidewalks, to Syria and Iraq, where Christians are being butchered by the forces of Wahhabist/Salafist jihadism directed by Riyadh and Ankara.

It is not only the Christians and other non-Muslims of eastern Malaysia who are feeling the threat of Wahhabism. The small state of Penang in northwestern peninsular Malaysia is also feeling the brunt of Wahhabist extremism. The government of Penang is a coalition dominated by the Democratic Action Party (DAP), a social democratic and secular party that leads among the ethnic Chinese. Penang, where a majority of the people are non-Muslim, was subjected to recent criticism by Wahhabist-influenced muftis and imams. Penangite Muslims were chastised for being too influenced by "infidels" in the state. In the eyes of these Muslim clerics, «infidels» are the Buddhists (36 percent), Hindus (about 9 percent), Christians (about 5 percent), and Taoists (some 5 percent).

There is but one solution for Penang. It should separate itself from the torment of Wahhabism. In the same manner that Singapore broke from the Malay federation in 1965, Penang should go its own way. In fact, Penang’s dominant party, the DAP, is the same party from which independent Singapore’s first prime minister, Lee Kuan Yew, originated. Lee feared domination of majority Chinese Singapore by proselyting Muslim Malay clerics and opted for independence. What was good for Singapore in 1965 is good for Penang today.

Maps of southeast Asia should be redrawn to show independent Sabah, Sarawak, and Penang. They should serve as a line of demarcation against any further Saudi Wahhabist penetration of Asia.

The Wahhabists and their co-ideologues want to challenge Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Shias, Ismailis, Ahmadiyyas, Ibadis, Yazidis, Alawites, Zaidis, Zoroastrians, Taoists, Alevis, and moderate Sunnis for control of large regions of the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and Europe. It is beyond time for non-Wahhabists to stand up to these religious brigands and reject their 13th century beliefs.

Wayne Madsen

Wayne Madsen
Investigative journalist, author and syndicated columnist, Madsen has over twenty years experience in security issues. 

As a U.S. Naval Officer, he managed one of the first computer security programs for the U.S. Navy. Madsen has been a frequent political and national security commentator on Fox News and has also appeared on ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, CNN, BBC and MS-NBC. He has been invited to testify as a witness before the US House of Representatives, the UN Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, and an terrorism investigation panel of the French government. A member of the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) and the National Press Club, Madsen is based and reports from Washington, D.C.

American Big Lie About "Terrorism"

Obama's bogus "war on terror" goes into overdrive as he sends the 101st Airborne into Syria  

By Eric Zuesse

Micah Zenko is a blogger who posts on a main site of America’s foreign-policy establishment, the Council on Foreign Relations, and he posted there on January 6th, "How Many Bombs Did the United States Drop in 2015?" He calculated: "Last year, the United States dropped an estimated total of 23,144 bombs in six countries. Of these, 22,110 were dropped in Iraq and Syria."

His curiosity about this question had been sparked because he noticed that, "The primary focus – meaning the commitment of personnel, resources, and senior leaders’ attention – of US counterterrorism policies is the capture or killing (though, overwhelmingly killing) of existing terrorists. 

I often ask US government officials and mid-level staffers, ‘what are you doing to prevent a neutral [Islamic] person from becoming a terrorist?’ 

They always claim this is not their responsibility, and point toward other agencies, usually the Department of State (DOS) or Department of Homeland Security (DHS), where this is purportedly their obligation internationally or domestically, respectively." But, Zenko noted, "The problem with this ‘kill-em’-all with airstrikes’ rule, is that it is not working."

However, whereas in the non-Islamic world, it’s an "ideology," it is instead a sect within the Islamic world; and, right now, it’s a rapidly growing one. It is, in fact, an offshoot of the Wahhabi sect of Sunni Islam that the Saud family have been advocating and promoting ever since the year 1744, and upon which they have established the nation that they now own. But, recently, it is inflaming much of the world.

America’s leaders use the word "terrorist" to refer to Shia Islam, and not only to Sunni Islam. But the reality is that all international jihadism except against Israel, has come from fundamentalist Sunni Islam, and is based in fundamentalist Sunni interpretations of the Quran.

Saudi public whipping

The only instances where there has been from Shiites anything like that terrorism – the terror-attacks against the US and Europe, such as 9/11 and Charlie Hebdo – was when the Shiite organization in Lebanon, Hezbollah, in the 1980s and ’90s bombed the US Embassy in Lebanon, Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, and the Israeli Embassy in London, especially so as to punish the US for donating $3 billion each year to enable Israel to continue being an apartheid state oppressing Muslims (called "Palestinians"). Whereas Israel (as long as it continues being an anti-Muslim apartheid state) has sound reason for opposing Hezbollah, no Western country has reason to consider Shiite nations to be a threat – yet the US does, and so do its European satellites. There is important history behind this reality:

Iran is the center of international Shiism. In 1953, the US and UK overthrew, in a US-run coup, the democratically elected non-sectarian and progressive Iranian President Mohammad Mosaddegh, and installed there a brutal Shah, who became world-renowned for his tortures and who did with Iran’s oil and gas what the US told him to do with it. Since Iran is the world’s leading Shiia-majority nation, the decades between the installation of the US puppet-Shah in 1953 and his overthrow by the increasingly rabidly anti-US Iranian public in 1979, were a chamber of Iranian horrors that served Washington and the oil-based US aristocracy, and that largely created the ongoing war between Shia Islam itself, versus the US and its allies.

Leading the anti-Shiite war is not the US, but instead the al-Saud family, which gained its rule in 1744 on an oath to destroy Shiites. As The Atlantic headlined on 21 September 2010, "Understanding the $60 Billion Saudi Arms Deal: It's About Iran." On 8 September 2015, the Congressional Research Service reported that during the five-year period from October 2010 - October 2014, the US and the Sauds signed deals to deliver $90 billion worth of US weaponry to them. That’s a lot of weapons-sales, all of which are from America’s arms-makers, to Saudi Arabia, for use by the al-Saud family – enough to join-at-the-hip America’s aristocracy to the Saud family, who are the core Saudi aristocrats and the world’s most powerful family.

On 28 January 2012, the Dayton Business Journal issued a carefully researched study, headlined "Top 10 foreign buyers of US weapons" and here were the rankings at that time: #1=Saudi Arabia; #2=UAE; #3=Egypt; #4=Taiwan; #5=Australia; #6=Iraq; #7=Pakistan; #8=UK; #9=Turkey; #10=S. Korea.

He who pays the piper calls the tune: those are the American aristocracy’s main allies.

The Western countries are allied with the royal families – all of them fundamentalist Sunnis – that own and run Saudi Arabia (the al-Sauds), Qatar (the al-Thanis), Kuwait (the al-Sabahs), Bahrain (the al-Khalifas) and the six royal families of UAE. All of those aristocratic families – even when they have conflicts between each other, such as the al-Thanis versus the al-Khalifas – all of them are led by the al-Sauds, because King Saud is by far the world’s richest person.

Perhaps none of the other royal families has anyone who controls more than a trillion dollars. Neither Forbes nor Bloomberg, in listing the world’s billionaires, includes any royal family, because capitalism gets a bad image if the public come to know that most of the world’s wealth is inherited, not earned by the owner. It’s mainly the result of two things: conquest, plus inheritance. The origin of King Saud’s wealth goes all the way back to the time of 1744, when the jihadist preacher Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab agreed with the Arab gang-leader Muhammad Ibn Saud, for Saud and his descendants to exterminate all Shia and take over the world and impose Wahhab’s version of Sunni Islam, and for Wahhab’s followers to recognize and accept the Saud family’s right to control the government.

That’s what America has become allied with. The American Government now doesn’t represent the American people – at least not in international relations. It represents the Sauds, who hate especially Iran and the Shiite secularist Bashar al-Assad who leads Syria, but also hate the Russians, for not only having been consistently opposed to jihadists (that’s to say, consistently opposed to Sunni extremists such as those Arab potentates send around the world), but for having friendly relations with Shiite-led countries, which these Arab potentates aim to destroy if not take over. Increasingly since 1970, US foreign policy serves those potentates – and, above all, serves the Saud family.

No Saudi King has ever bowed to any US President. Hierarchy exists in international power. However, for US Presidents to bow to Saudi Kings does not mean that the US Government subordinates itself to the Saud family in all matters, but only that in an overall sense the US Government in international affairs serves primarily the interests of the Saud family – the world’s richest family. That’s what these bows mean; that’s what they actually signify.

The Sauds keep control over their own country not only by means of the local clergy authenticating the Sauds’ authority from God to rule, and by means of the US supply of weapons and training to the Sauds’ army, but also by means of the Sauds’ iron control over all their nation’s news-media, so that the Saudi public will continue to accept the political status quo in their country and will believe that anyone the Sauds kill is deserving of death. If any of these means of controlling the public – weapons, media, and clergy – were to end, violent revolution would break out in their country.

The Saudi public are brainwashed so much that they admire ISIS. On 19 March 2015, the Muslim Statistics website bannered: "Saudi Arabia: 92% approve of ISIS representation of Islam and Sharia law – Poll." Therefore any ‘democracy’ which might follow after the end of the Sauds’ rule there would inevitably be just as extremist as the al-Sauds themselves are but incredibly violent and chaotic, and probably led by the Wahhabist clergy directly (which would be the only remaining authority there), basically cutting the Saud family out of the political picture and installing instead a professedly jihadist government (which the Sauds are not – they couldn’t be that and simultaneously retain any support from their subordinate aristocracies, especially the American and other non-Islamic ones).

Executing Indonesian maids is a Saudi national sport and at the same time conveniently erases evidence of their rape and torture

Several commentators have noted the similarity between the Islamic law that’s applied by ISIS in Iraq and Syria, and the Islamic law that’s applied by the Saud family in Saudi Arabia. When the US Government allies with the Sauds, the only agreement or disagreement about anything is with the personnel in charge, not on any matter of principle, because the US Government is already allied with extremist Sunnis.

America’s foreign policies are therefore personal, not based on principles (except on the principle: Might makes right, and wealth means might; so, wealth means right).

When the US Government opposes Shiite-led nations such as Iran and Syria, the purpose isn’t to defeat terrorism (except perhaps against Israel), but to serve the aspirations of the Sauds and their friends.

If the US Government were serious about protecting its people against terrorist attacks, then the US Government would apologize to the people of Iran and would switch its alliances within the Muslim world to Iran and away from the Saud family. This would not mean that the US would have to endorse Shiite sectarianism: in fact, Iran’s chief ally abroad is the Shiite leader of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, whose basic commitment (as a leader of the Ba'ath Party) has always been to oppose any control over the state by any religion.

On 21 April 2015, International Business Times headlined: "Christians Threatened By ISIS In Lebanon Turn To Hezbollah For Help," and their Alessandria Masi reported from Ras Baalbek Lebanon, and interviewed "Rifat Nasrallah [who] commands the Christian militia of Ras Baalbek, aligned with Shiite group Hezbollah, to fight the Islamic State group in Lebanon." His army were allied with "Hezbollah fighters. The members of the Shiite militia, which the European Union and the US both consider a terrorist group, are concerned about the Sunni jihadis from Syria enough to make common cause with Christians. In fact, the Christians of Ras Baalbek and the Iran-backed militants are downright friendly to each other… They are pioneering a new approach: Christians and Shiites together, against the Sunni extremists… ‘The only people who are protecting us are the resistance of Hezbollah,’ Nasrallah said. ‘The only one standing with the army is Hezbollah. Let’s not hide it anymore.’" ISIS was spreading from Syria into Lebanon.

Indirectly, their common enemy then was the United States (and its European allies) – because the US was actually allied with the Sunni extremists who were fighting to bring down the non-sectarian Shiite, Bashar al-Assad, in Syria, and replace him with a fundamentalist-Sunni leader, in accord with the desires of the Arabic oil families.

It would be wrong to say that the United States is a terrorist nation, but the US is the world’s leading backer of international terrorism. The US supplies the weapons through its fundamentalist-Sunni allies in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Kuwait, UAE, and Libya. The US is serving as the most important international agent of the Saud family.

That’s the reality. The Big Lie about terrorism is that the West (US and its subordinate aristocracies in Europe) opposes international terrorism. International terrorism in Iraq, Libya, and Syria, drives millions of refugees from those countries into Europe, but the United States is allied with the Saud family producing this refugee crisis there. That’s just a fact.

And even some regular readers of propaganda-sites for the American aristocracy have come to understand this.

This news bureau contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.  We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.



The real truth on 9/11 slowly continues to bleed out

Technical experts are mounting major challenges to official U.S. government accounts of how three World Trade Center skyscrapers collapsed in near-freefall after the 9/11 attacks 15 years ago.

Many researchers are focusing especially on the little-known collapse of



The Geopolitics Of The United States, Part 1: The Inevitable Empire

The Empire and the inevitable fall of the Obama criminal regime

STRATFOR Editor’s Note: This installment on the United States, presented in two parts, is the 16th in a series of STRATFOR monographs on the geopolitics of countries influential in world affairs.

Like nearly all of the peoples of North and South America, most Americans are not originally from the territory that became the United States.



Geopolitics Of The United States Part 2: American Identity And The Threats of Tomorrow

A look back at 2011 predictions for the future in order to put events of today into perspective

 photo capitalism_zpsah78uy5p.jpg
We have already discussed in the first part of this analysis how the American geography dooms whoever controls the territory to being a global power, but there are a number of other outcomes that shape what that power will be like. The first and most critical is the impact of that geography on the American mindset.



By Robert S. Finnegan

This e-mail outlines and confirms the acts of espionage against Indonesia and Indonesians by Akiko Makino and the others involved both in Kobe University and in AI Lab at University of Airlangga, Surabaya; Bahasa Indonesia original follows English translation...



UPDATED 01/07/2015 : New Analysis Challenges Tamiflu Efficacy; Hong Kong Corona Virus Outbreak


 photo TAMIFLU_small_zpssojx6okt.jpg

Obama criminals now resulting to biowarfare in quest to destroy Chinese and ASEAN economy; "novel virus substrain" points directly to a Kawaoka / Fouchier / Ernala-Ginting Kobe lab virus weaponized and genetically altered to specifically target and infect the Asian population: Ribavirin...



 photo WHO02_zpsplmhtlpr.jpg
The 5th Estate has just purchased a library on H5N1 "Novel" virus pandemics, there are dozens of PDF and Exel documents we feel will assist you in saving lives following intentional releases of the H5N1 and now MERS viruses; we will begin by printing those that appear to be extremely relevant here: H5N1 Kobe-Kawaoka-Ernala series continues soon with more "Smoking Gun" e-mails from Teridah Ernala to The 5th Estate . . .



By Robert S. Finnegan

On October 12, 2002 the Indonesian island of Bali experienced a terrorist attack that rocked the world. It was unquestionably well-coordinated and executed, the largest in the country's history.