Sunday, July 19, 2015

Celebrities And World's Rich Lining Up To Snap Up Greek Islands

Dismemberment of Greece begins; CNN frauds and hacks responsible: Capitalism and Fascism join forces to destroy the birthplace of democracy


Johnny Depp has reportedly become the latest celebrity to take advantage of Greece’s plunging economic woes to score a deal and gift himself a small private island.

According to the Athens Macedonian News Agency, Depp is said to have purchased a piece of uninhabited land in the Aegean Sea spanning about 0.2 km for 4.2 million euros.

Likewise it was reported last month that Brad Pitt and wife Angelina Jolie-Pitt were eying up Gaia Island to possibly snap it up and add it to their real estate portfolio which already includes a French castle. As part of Greece’s bailout plan, the government will have to sell off €50 billion in assets. 

And much of that will likely come from selling off some of their 1,200 to 6,000 islands.

Aside from wealthy celebrities, it’s reported that affluent Russian and Chinese investors are also lining up to pick up Greek properties.

If you’re in the market for a private getaway in the Mediterranean, has a directory of islands for sale with prices starting at €3 million, including Gaia Island which, according to the site, has yet to be snatched up.

THESE are the CNN frauds and pro-EU bankster corporate hacks that led the "mainstream media" anti-Greek propaganda blitzkreig, shilling for "austerity" and the carving up of Greek assets; they will most likely be repaid for their services with islands of their own as Greece is sold off and served up to elitist buyers

Described as “the perfect millionaires’ playground,” Gaia spans 43 acres and is part of the Echinades. The waters are also said to present prime conditions for water sports, sailing, fishing, deep sea diving and swimming.

Other celebrities who already own property in Greece include Sean Connery and Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson.

This news bureau contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.  We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

WAYNE MADSEN : Netanyahu Mobilizes His "Fifth Column" In America

Zionist nutcase Netanyahu more obsessed with sparking WWIII than Obama criminals, and may just accomplish the incineration of Israel  

By Wayne Madsen

Even before the P5+1 countries announced in Vienna their milestone Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) agreement with Iran, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu was mobilizing his "fifth column" of Israeli operatives in the U.S. Congress, the media, Washington area "think tanks," and religious leaders to lambaste the agreement and vow to overturn it at the earliest opportunity. 

Netanyahu was already counting votes in the U.S. Senate for a presidential veto-proof majority that would dump the agreement.

One of the first hyperbolic barrages came on the heavily Israeli-influenced Fox News Network where the mustachioed former U.S. ambassador the United Nations John Bolton wasted no time in not only criticizing the nuclear deal but also Russia for wanting to fuel a new Middle East arms race. 

Representative Ed Royce, the Republican chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, criticized the pact because he said it would allow Russia to begin transferring missile technology to Iran in eight years.

Neo-cons, as they have shown in the past, do not let a diplomatic "crisis" – usually one of their own making – go to waste. Before long, the usual right-wing cacophony in Washington was linking the Iran nuclear deal to Russia in Ukraine, China in the South China Sea, and Iran’s so-called "support for terrorism." Only in the mind of a neocon is support for the legitimate aspirations of the Shi’as and Zaidis of Lebanon and Yemen, respectively, and the Alawites of Syria considered "terrorism."

For neo-conservatives like Bolton and South Carolina Republican senator and 2016 presidential candidate Lindsey Graham, the Vienna pact represented an apocalyptic event that propelled them to accuse the P5+1 of "declaring war" on Israel.

Miss Lindsey Graham

Although the nuclear deal placed strict limitations on Iran’s nuclear power program for a period of ten years, it is clear that Netanyahu and his American "fifth column" wanted no deal at all and reserved the option to militarily attack Iran. Obama could not even count on support from all the Democrats in the Congress, a testament to the strength of Israel’s lobbyists on Capitol Hill. Democrats Chuck Schumer of New York, the incoming Senate Minority Leader and Ben Cardin of Maryland, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said they would have to scrutinize the deal before deciding whether to support it. Schumer and Cardin are both Jewish and major supporters of Netanyahu’s government. Their attitudes were likely shaped by headlines appearing on Jewish news websites and in Jewish newspapers calling July 14, the day of the agreement, "Black Tuesday." For the melodramatically-inclined "Israel Firsters," Vienna became Munich and Obama became British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain.

However, in what was not good news for Netanyahu and his allies in Washington, Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, who is also Jewish, said she supported the agreement. Other Democratic Jewish senators voicing initial but reserved support included Al Franken of Minnesota and Barbara Boxer of California, in addition to Independent Socialist and 2016 presidential candidate Bernie Sanders of Vermont.

Israeli government spokespersons and their marionettes in the American media made much of Arab opposition to the nuclear deal. 

However, aside from Saudi opposition, which had been clear from the outset of the P5+1 talks, Oman gave the deal a hearty thumbs up, seeing major economic benefits to it arising from the lifting of sanctions on Iran. Congratulations were also sent to Iranian President Hassan Rouhani from the leaders of the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, Syria, Iraq, and Egypt. Israel’s attempt to portray the Arab nations as standing united with Israel against the nuclear pact only found a receptive ear in the right-wing Israeli media, U.S. papers like The Los Angeles Times and Wall Street Journal, the ownership of both being part of the Israel Lobby, and the Washington bureaus of CNN and Fox News.

Colombia, long a diplomatic ally of Israel, saw its president, Juan Manuel Santos, praise the nuclear deal worked out between the P5+1 and Iran. As far as the United Nations, which supported the P5+1 efforts, Netanyahu remained a laughing stock ever since his 2012 condescending address to the U.N. General Assembly when his cartoon depicting a sizzling Iranian nuclear bomb brought laughter from many of the delegates.

Although Netanyahu prized Israel’s closer relations with India’s Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, Tel Aviv’s diplomatic isolation became apparent when Modi held his first bilateral meeting with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit the previous week in Ufa, in Russia’s Bashkortostan republic. India saw the lifting of sanctions against Iran as a potential windfall for India, which is eager to buy more Iranian oil and increase its own exports to Iran.

All Netanyahu and his fanatic rightist government could do was threaten to launch a unilateral military attack on Iran. From Jerusalem, Netanyahu told reporters, "Israel is not bound by this deal with Iran, and Israel is not bound by this deal with Iran because Iran continues to seek our destruction." In what would have been unthinkable a few years ago, Israel was seen by the majority of the world’s population as a theocratic regime that promoted war and Iran was viewed as a country promoting peace in the region. There was no way that the saber-rattling Netanyahu and his American apologists could spin their way out of that stark fact of life. And Israel’s intransigence did nothing but give further support to the international boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel over its increasingly cruel and unpopular policies toward the Palestinians and Israeli Arabs, including the country’s Bedouin population.

The historic achievement in Vienna demonstrated for the world which nations are interested in peace and which are solely interested in war. Iran, a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, became a new diplomatic "rock star." Meanwhile, Israel, a non-signatory to the non-proliferation treaty, even though it’s the Middle East’s only nuclear weapons country, has become the diplomatic world’s decrepit old man, whining about inane issues from the past and badly in need of an adult diaper change.

Wayne Madsen

Investigative journalist, author and syndicated columnist, Madsen has over twenty years experience in security issues. 

As a U.S. Naval Officer, he managed one of the first computer security programs for the U.S. Navy. Madsen has been a frequent political and national security commentator on Fox News and has also appeared on ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, CNN, BBC and MS-NBC. He has been invited to testify as a witness before the US House of Representatives, the UN Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, and an terrorism investigation panel of the French government. A member of the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) and the National Press Club, Madsen is based and reports from Washington, D.C.

The Greeks Trying To Shape Their Own History : EU’S IMPENDING COLLAPSE?

IMF Nazis, ECB banker terrorists, Merkel picked the wrong country to advance their agenda for the enslavement of the free peoples of the EU  

By Norman Pollack

People move events. The Greek people are trying to shape their own history. They aren’t there yet—even the Left hasn’t quite joined them.

But a coalescence of forces is on the horizon: either Syriza radicalizes or it will be left behind.

Capitalism by its very harshness is creating its own antithesis. Ideological labels are not important; what is, is a genuine people’s government. 

The riots in Athens, while the Greek Parliament passed the austerity measures, may be the first sign of the breakup of the EU, itself a political formation of advanced capitalism unable to meet the needs of its poorer members. 

Shrinkage, disruption, and greater transparency, the last signifying EU’s role as spearhead for US-defined globalization, the mix of market fundamentalism and militarism, would be difficult to hide and all three revealing unity as a German-inspired economic monolith for achieving an intra-Europe division of labor, nations rich (North) and poor (South), while providing political cover for NATO in its continued prosecution of the Cold War.

Austerity is repression, pure and simple. It is also, as I recently pointed out, the framework for class warfare, in both cases to the extreme detriment of working people.

The people in the Athens street know this, know that Tsipras and Syriza have not done right by them. The public workers’ union went out on strike Wednesday. Crowds gathered before Parliament in the evening. Tsakalotos, the new finance minister, was shaken, reluctant to approve the bailout, in microcosm, representing the many, in and out of the party, who saw the mounting pressures and if not succumbed then made a forced choice.

This was not the affirmation one expects from a basic settlement, and rather, a period of deliberation, of gathering force that, should the EU turn the screws further, might well explode, not as revolution, but a willingness to say No and from there leave the eurozone and the EU itself.

Why would Germany and the other stalwarts, Finland, the Netherlands, and the Baltic countries care?

For the reason that Greece is a living refutation of all the stalwarts value: balanced budgets, taxation favoring business growth, gradual diminishment of labor rights, erosion of pension and social-welfare programs, etc.

By bringing Greece to its knees validates austerity: there is no other way than this, the best of all possible worlds. Capitalism, both in Europe and America (indeed everywhere), thrives on false consciousness lest its destructiveness becomes apparent.

Hence, it must thwart Left social movements; antecedently, it must deny the idea of alternatives, that which shows a better way to social justice, peace, a humane life.

Greece is on the edge of the precipice, struggling not to be pushed over into the abyss. It wants to fight back (here calls to national honor and dignity are not empty and/or retrograde rhetoric), where for once nationalism–in the face of imposed conformity to rules, procedures, and values intended for permanent political-economic subjugation—acts historically as a progressive social force.

Supra-nationalism, candy to the idealist, turns out to be rotten, and is workable, worthwhile, and just, only when it is equalitarian in structure and substance, which the EU is not.

Today, small riots, as the gap widens between citizenry and politicians; tomorrow, with other nations in the EU watching events in Greece, and facing similar if not identical circumstances of deprivation, perhaps they too—Italy, Spain, Portugal, Ireland—will take to the streets and proclaim No to austerity, as increasingly the viper’s nest of fascism.

I hear pebbles loosening in the base of the EU edifice, which is ever so slowly shaking. Yet it takes little, one or more false moves, for the ground itself to rumble.

Avowed declarations of denying sympathy for those hurt by austerity, Merkel leading the chorus, may register 3.1 on the political Richter scale, but a 5.5 mark is in the cards when the EU professes clearly its identity as the viable political setting for NATO to move ever eastward in confrontation-mode against Russia.

The same countries critical of Greece are in the vanguard of anti-Russian feeling. As I’ve noted elsewhere, Latvia is now the dumping ground for heavy weaponry near the Russian border, with B-52s in the skies. Is this relevant to Greece?

Yes, it is being punished less for indebtedness as such than for exposing the fragile character of EU unity and the means used to keep the member nations in line.

The psychopathology of militarization has been made a supremely binding agent for economic cooperation, false consciousness carried to lengths Marx never envisioned—hence, deviations, like the Greek referendum itself, must be ridiculed and viewed as un-European and ingratitude.

I am heartened, though, by the scenes before the Greek Parliament hours ago. The Greek people have an unquenchable thirst for freedom.

Norman Pollack has written on Populism. His interests are social theory and the structural analysis of capitalism and fascism. He can be reached at

This news bureau contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.  We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.    

Agency To Enslave Greeks Is Established

The Greeks have been sold out once more and this time the ECB banksters, Merkel and Lagarde will reap the rewards of their attempt to enslave the free peoples of the EU  

By Eric Zuesse

Late on Thursday, July 16th, German Economic News headlined “Greece: Debt Restructuring Through the Back Door,” and reported that, “The majority of Greece’s national debt is to be moved in the next three years gradually to the euro bailout fund ESM [European Stability Mechanism], so that the IMF will continue to remain as a lender. The euro zone countries will thereby provide Athens a longer grace period [a temporary postponement of payments, while the 18% annual interest-rate soars Greece’s debt even higher], and longer repayment periods.”

The super-secretive European Stability Mechanism was set up in 2012, in order to handle Greece’s anticipated virtual receivership, which it now will do.

As I reported on July 16th, the treaty that in 2012 established the ESM, as being the ultimate lending-fund, for what the EU now officially considers to be a permanent economic crisis in Europe — of Greece and other member-nations that are experiencing “severe financing problems” — establishes the ESM as being so secretive, that a precondition of employment there is “Professional secrecy,” which will apply “even after their duties have ceased” (i.e., they’ve retired). In other words: the goal is that the public will never be able to know anything that goes on there, except what the top management issue in their speeches and press releases (if any). Furthermore, the ESM is above and beyond any democratic process, and is immune to any nation’s laws. Everyone in its employ “shall be immune from legal proceedings with respect to acts performed by them in their official capacity and shall enjoy inviolability in respect of their official papers and documents.” (That’s necessary in order to ensure that no information can ever be released by the employees — only the ESM’s public statements will be.) There will be no democratic accountability, whatsoever. Moreover, “the ESM, its assets, income, property and its operations and transactions authorised by this Treaty shall be exempt from all direct taxes.” (This is because to tax a collection-agency that’s collecting for the aristocracy would be to impose a tax upon the aristocracy — it would reduce their take.)

German Economic News goes on to report that:

“By the gradual restructuring of the Greek ECB and IMF liabilities to the ESM, Athens is to be largely isolated for years from principal and interest payments. Meanwhile, Merkel can continue to say that a classic haircut did not take place [meaning that all of the principal and interest will continue to be due — they’re merely being postponed while the debt is still growing], but at the same time the oppressive principal and interest payments by Greece will be moved into the distant future [and then collected by ESM]. In fact, it is the principal and interest payments to the ECB and the IMF, which recently brought Athens especially into trouble [for example, by growing Greek debt from 110B euros in 2010, to 323B euros in 2015], while there will be applied to the direct and indirect (via the euro rescue package) loans of euro-zone countries to Greece, elongated repayment and repayment periods. This temporary neutralizing of the Greek debt mountain gets Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras through the back door that he so vehemently demanded: he will have air to breathe.” In other words: until he is re-elected, Greeks won’t yet have experienced the full ferocity of what had hit them with. And: the longer they don’t experience it, the worse it will become when it does hit.

Here is what has hit the Greeks, that is known about currently:

As my July 16th report also had noted, a confidential document, dated 11 June 2013, “Real Estate Based Asset Financing for the Hellenic Republic,” describes one portion (the real estate sales) of the planned privatization of the Greek government, Greece’s transfer away from any semblance of democracy, to ownership by international investors. (This can be compared, in some ways, to Obama’s proposed TPP, TTIP, and TISA, international ‘trade’ deals. It, too, is a huge assault against, even a killer of, democracy.) The document says, “The sale of state-owned assets is a one-off opportunity to raise capital for the Hellenic Republic.” These sales will be occurring while principal and interest on the debt will be postponed and growing. The idea here is that the trap of the Greek public, by the aristocracy, must not snap until there is no way for the victim (the Greek public) to escape from it. Their taxes will soar, while their formerly free government services, including roads, health care, education, pensions, etc, will henceforth be provided by profit-making corporations, at profit-producing prices. The taxes they pay will be going instead to the bondholders.

One thing that I did not, on July 16th, quote from the document, and which is particularly pertinent here, is the following:

“Since it will be impossible for the Holding Company to assume any powers now vested in the Hellenic Republic’s legislative, executive and administrative bodies, the Troika [IMF, European Central Bank, and European Commission] will need to continue to play its role with the evolving list of actions required for the appropriate administrative and legislative actions to continue to be taken.” In other words: some way must be found so that the Greek government will continue to do the Troika’s will. “However, the monitoring of these actions and the determination of any new ones could be transferred to the Supervisory Board who could perform such monitoring and determination better in the context of the Holding Company’s business plan and the MoU’s long term goals.” The MoU, or Memorandum of Understanding, was reached between “the Hellenic Republic” or Greece, and the European Commission, in February 2012, shortly before the European Stability Mechanism was instituted later that year, as the planned agency to carry out the enslavement of Greece’s public. This was an agreement saying that the welfare of the people of Greece played second fiddle to the interests of the people who had lent money to Greece by purchasing Greek government bonds. Here is how Steven Alfonso Panageotou in 2012 described the start of the crisis:

“The ostensible start of the current financial crisis in Greece can be traced back to November 5, 2009. On this day, the newly elected socialist Prime Minister George Papandreu announced that the previous government, the conservative party of New Democracy under the leadership of Kostas Karamanlis, had lied and concealed the actual size of Greece’s deficit … . Papandreou revealed that the true size of the Greek deficit for 2009 would be 12.7 percent of GDP, not the 6 percent of GDP that the Karamanlis government had forecasted months earlier. … On December 7, 2009, the credit ratings agency Standard and Poor’s announced it would place Greece’s ‘A-minus’ long-term sovereign credit rating on ‘Credit Watch’ with negative implications. … This act can be seen as the defining moment that set in motion the … crisis.”

On 8 February 2010, Germany’s Spiegel bannered, “How Goldman Sachs Helped Greece to Mask its True Debt,” and reported that, “Goldman Sachs helped the Greek government to mask the true extent of its deficit with the help of a derivatives deal that legally circumvented the EU Maastricht deficit rules. At some point the so-called cross currency swaps will mature, and swell the country’s already bloated deficit. … The US bankers devised a special kind of swap with fictional exchange rates. … ‘The Maastricht rules can be circumvented quite legally through swaps,’ says a German derivatives dealer. In previous years, Italy used a similar trick to mask its true debt with the help of a different US bank.” 

Who were the beneficiaries of this fraud upon international investors, by the Greek aristocracy? 

The September 2010 International Socialist Review bannered “Crisis, Austerity, and Class Struggle in Greece,” and Antonis Davanellos wrote:

The banks [bailed out by EU and U.S. taxpayers] that were the champions of neoliberalism [U.S. ‘libertarianism’] in the Balkans are now in debt, and their future is very uncertain. Also, big Greek construction companies were taking jobs inside Greece, the Balkans and Turkey, and in other places like Dubai—and you know what happened with construction in Dubai (the Gulf state that needed a bailout from neighboring Abu Dhabi). Then there were the Greek commercial capitalists, who were dominant in the Balkans.

These three strong elements have been destroyed by the economic crisis. That is the basis of the economic problems of Greece.

The second factor in the economic crisis is the cost of the Greek state’s huge intervention to save the banks—a bailout, as you say here. In one night, Karamanlis gave the banks 28 billion euros. That’s not so much, in international terms. But in an economy like Greece’s, it is huge. Compare that to the 25 billion euros that the finance minister [in the successor, socialist, government] wants to collect with his bitter program of austerity. It’s less than what they have given to the banks in one night. And Papandreou is continuing this bailout.

A third factor in the crisis is the cost of twenty years of neoliberalism [the ideology that in the United States is called ‘libertarianism’]. At the beginning of the 1990s, the profits of capitalists were taxed at 45 percent. Now they have 20 percent for industry and 12 percent for the banks. This is a huge decline, but the problem is not just that.

The last few years—during all the years of Karamanlis’s government—rich people, the capitalists, the big enterprises, and the banks weren’t paying taxes at all. They were keeping the money—and not only from their taxes, but also the taxes they were collecting from workers in their enterprises. So you can see that the public finances of Greece depend only on taxes on salaries [i.e., workers], which [especially if a large proportion of that take isn’t even going to the government] isn’t enough [to avoid huge government deficits].

A fourth element in the economic crisis is international speculation. I will give you two examples: Goldman Sachs was the adviser to all the Greek governments about how to deal with government debt—and all the governments did what Goldman Sachs said. [That’s deceptive: the principal there was actually the Greek President; Goldman Sachs had been hired, as his agent.] At the same time, Goldman Sachs was advising huge hedge funds to gamble on the idea that the Greek state, in the end, would not be able to deal with the debt. [GS was advising there different principals, not the Greek President.]

So: Greek workers were having taxes deducted from their paychecks, but their employers weren’t transferring all of those withholdings to the government. It was a conservative government, which believed in trickle-down, and which therefore was determined to please its financial backers, who owned the corporations, which were rampantly evading taxes (like many U.S. corporations also do). Any conservative government serves the power-elite, not the public, and Greece had a conservative government. Conservatism exists to exploit the public, not to serve it. That’s why conservative governments believe in trickle-down, not in percolate-up, economics.

Throughout, Greece’s aristocrats were the beneficiaries of the loans that kept the Karamanlis government going. The Greek public received little to none of it, but get the blame as if they’d received most or all of it.

The Greek public are now being condemned as ‘leaches’ and such, and are being demanded to pay back — and with junk-bond interest-rates on top — the billions that Greece’s aristocracy had skimmed off the system, while Wall Street banks had assisted the conservative Greek government to hide from other countries’ aristocrats the skimming that was going on with the money they had lent in the form of Greek bonds.

U.S. and Greek aristocrats had robbed other aristocrats; and, starting in 2012, all aristocrats have set up a system, the European Stability Mechanism, to extract from the general Greek public, in the future, the wealth that will compensate some aristocrats for money that had been defrauded from those aristocrats by other aristocrats, defrauded until the fraud (never yet punished — nor even sought to be punished) was made public in late 2009. Moreover, the general Greek public are being blamed for all of this. That blame-shift downward is necessary to do, in order to ‘justify’ the Greek public’s future enslavement, in a modern form of debt-bondage, of a national kind, for debts in which the public had, actually, played no significant (if any) part, and the proceeds from which had instead gone mainly to Greece’s billionaires and centi-millionaires (and largely stashed by them in Switzerland and other tax-havens, thus now inaccessible, so that the Greek public are the targets instead, by the other aristocrats, the ones who had been victimized by their fellow-aristocrats).

Instead of security being provided to the public, and risk being taken on by aristocrats (because they can afford it), security is provided to aristocrats, and their risky losing bets are being guaranteed to them by the public, which takes on those aristocrats’ losses, while never having stood to gain anything from those aristocrats’ bets (which are euphemistically called ‘investments,’ and which were priced fraudulently).

The Greek public will thus, in an all-too-real sense, be collectively imprisoned to pay for the crimes by some aristocrats, against other aristocrats. This is a reality that Adam Smith’s economic theory, which was designed to please aristocrats, essentially ignored, as being even a possibility (even though the phenomenon of aristocrats cheating aristocrats has always commonly occured, throughout history).

There’s an hour-long documentary searching for individual suspects behind the now-endless European financial crisis, but none of the investigators in it can dig so deep as to identify even one of the ultimate beneficiaries of the bailouts, beyond the standard generic abstractions, “banks” and politicians”: The chief interviewer persists in saying (57:20) “we are sitting in one boat.” But that’s not true, at all. Some people belong in prison, or worse. Obviously, not everyone does. At the end of his many interviews with agents for the international aristocracy, not even a single suspect has been named. However, also obviously, the biggest crooks aren’t found in prisons. (If one of them were, the interviewers would easily have been able to contact one of the recipients.) They’re in one or another of their multitudinous mansions, or in some private jet going from one to another of them, or to meetings with others of them. After all, the “World’s Richest 0.7% Own 13.67 Times as Much as World’s Poorest 68.7%.” Furthermore, in the United States, “the losses from the Wall Street economic crash went overwhelmingly to the poorer half of the U.S. population (their wealth going down from 2.5% to only 1.1% of America’s total), because of the bailouts to Wall Street,” but the “wealthiest 0.0025% (Forbes 400) own 2.75% (of all trackable privately-held wealth, not including ‘non-profits’ that are controlled by them),” which 2.75% is more than twice the 1.1% that the bottom 50% of Americans own. The Forbes 400 richest billionaires were probably on the receiving end of America’s bailouts. Or at least they benefited as if they had been.

If this holding-the-public-hostage-for-aristocrats’-crimes is not a revolutionary situation, at least as bad as in 1776 America, 1789 France, 1848 Europe, and 1917 Russia, then what is? And who should be blamed for it, if the victims, the Greek public, won’t be (such as aristocrats around the world wish the Greek public to be blamed for it)?

Perhaps the people to blame for it are same the people that are benefiting from it (and from their misdirection of blame downward, to some of their own victims). Perhaps the criminals who are doing this should be punished, instead of served. Many of these criminals own ‘news’ media that hide, or obscure, the real culprits, in order to receive yet more advertising income from their fellow-aristocratic colleagues. After all, if an advertiser in your magazine had fraudulently sold you an investment, would you rather that the public bail you out from the loss (while they won’t know they did), or that he bail you out from it — and that he then stop his ads and you lose a crucial customer? Suing a major customer can turn out to have been a very bad business decision, and billionaires tend to pride themselves on making good business decisions.

How deep and wide does this pervasive, systematic, corruption at the top go? How can it be stopped? What must be done? Or will things just continue on, as they now are, toward and into international fascism — might makes right? 

It’s already almost as if the Axis powers had won WW II. Are the fascists worming their way back, towards an ultimate victory, with no more need for weapons of war — deceit can now do this job just fine? Maybe democracy is already dead. Perhaps even revolutions are only past history, curiosities of an earlier age, when people at least hoped for democracy, which they no longer can see any way to achieve.

Or, if there is still some intelligent and informed hope remaining, then what is it?

This news bureau contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.  We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.    



The real truth on 9/11 slowly continues to bleed out

Technical experts are mounting major challenges to official U.S. government accounts of how three World Trade Center skyscrapers collapsed in near-freefall after the 9/11 attacks 15 years ago.

Many researchers are focusing especially on the little-known collapse of



The Geopolitics Of The United States, Part 1: The Inevitable Empire

The Empire and the inevitable fall of the Obama criminal regime

STRATFOR Editor’s Note: This installment on the United States, presented in two parts, is the 16th in a series of STRATFOR monographs on the geopolitics of countries influential in world affairs.

Like nearly all of the peoples of North and South America, most Americans are not originally from the territory that became the United States.



Geopolitics Of The United States Part 2: American Identity And The Threats of Tomorrow

A look back at 2011 predictions for the future in order to put events of today into perspective

 photo capitalism_zpsah78uy5p.jpg
We have already discussed in the first part of this analysis how the American geography dooms whoever controls the territory to being a global power, but there are a number of other outcomes that shape what that power will be like. The first and most critical is the impact of that geography on the American mindset.



By Robert S. Finnegan

This e-mail outlines and confirms the acts of espionage against Indonesia and Indonesians by Akiko Makino and the others involved both in Kobe University and in AI Lab at University of Airlangga, Surabaya; Bahasa Indonesia original follows English translation...



UPDATED 01/07/2015 : New Analysis Challenges Tamiflu Efficacy; Hong Kong Corona Virus Outbreak


 photo TAMIFLU_small_zpssojx6okt.jpg

Obama criminals now resulting to biowarfare in quest to destroy Chinese and ASEAN economy; "novel virus substrain" points directly to a Kawaoka / Fouchier / Ernala-Ginting Kobe lab virus weaponized and genetically altered to specifically target and infect the Asian population: Ribavirin...



 photo WHO02_zpsplmhtlpr.jpg
The 5th Estate has just purchased a library on H5N1 "Novel" virus pandemics, there are dozens of PDF and Exel documents we feel will assist you in saving lives following intentional releases of the H5N1 and now MERS viruses; we will begin by printing those that appear to be extremely relevant here: H5N1 Kobe-Kawaoka-Ernala series continues soon with more "Smoking Gun" e-mails from Teridah Ernala to The 5th Estate . . .



By Robert S. Finnegan

On October 12, 2002 the Indonesian island of Bali experienced a terrorist attack that rocked the world. It was unquestionably well-coordinated and executed, the largest in the country's history.