A new booming business to replace American jobs shipped overseas by the Obama criminals and Congress traitors; these satanic machines may be shot down by the public utilising individual state deadly force laws, the only requirement being "fear for life" - next is an open season on operators and manufacturers
CNET
By Chris Matyszczyk
07/31/2015
We need to talk anti-aircraft weaponry.
 |
These illegal machines will soon be shot down by
the thousands, operators targeted and taken out
|
More and more so-called enthusiasts are sending drones into the sky. This means that more and more normal humans are becoming enthusiastic about shooting them out of the sky.
Especially, as in the case of William H. Merideth, the drone is hovering over your house.
Merideth, 47, lives in Hillview, Kentucky.
As WDRB-TV reports, a neighbor heard gunshots and called the police. Merideth allegedly told the police that a drone was hovering over his house, where his teen daughter (he has two) was sunbathing.
So he pulled out his gun and gave it a merry death.
The drone's owner, police say, said he was flying it to take pictures of a neighboring house.
However, Merideth told WRDB: "Well, I came out and it was down by the neighbor's house, about 10 feet off the ground, looking under their canopy that they've got under their back yard. I went and got my shotgun and I said, 'I'm not going to do anything unless it's directly over my property.'"
 |
Enraged home owner William H. Merideth blows machine of of the sky; drone was owned by civilians possibly taking images of his teenage daughter while sunbathing |
And then it allegedly was.
Merideth explained: "I didn't shoot across the road, I didn't shoot across my neighbor's fences, I shot directly into the air."
He says that shortly after the shooting, he received a visit from four men who claimed to be responsible for the drone and explaining that it cost $1,800.
 |
Perverts have been quick to seize on drones to photograph and film underage girls to fuel the porn industry |
Merideth says he stood his ground: "I had my 40 mm Glock on me and they started toward me and I told them, 'If you cross my sidewalk, there's gonna be another shooting.'"
The FAA's recommendations include not flying above 400 feet and "Don't fly near people or stadiums." The FAA adds: "You could be fined for endangering people or other aircraft."
 |
Deadly Force laws: all that is needed to utilise them
is "fear for life"
|
For his part, Merideth says he will sue the drone's owners.
He told WRDB: "You know, when you're in your own property, within a six-foot privacy fence, you have the expectation of privacy. We don't know if he was looking at the girls. We don't know if he was looking for something to steal. To me, it was the same as trespassing."
 |
Manufacturers and operators attempting to try on the transparent, bullshit excuse that these infernal machines have legitimate uses, and Americans are not buying it. |
It's not hard to have some sympathy with Merideth, if not with his draconian methods of sanction.
But this sort of incident will only get more complicated as companies such as Amazon begin to fly drones that deliver underwear and nail clippers.
Drones aren't supposed to fly over buildings. Surely Amazon's flying machines won't be able to avoid such an event.
 |
There is no way for Americans to identify these machines, as markings are too small to be read and even then they can be easily counterfeited; cops have no right to utilise this technology for any reason as they can't control or properly use the weapons they are already in possession of: Imagine, feral pigs with guns on drones loose in your city |
Please imagine your neighborhood airspace suddenly full of undergarments, toys, books and other coveted items floating through the air after the drone carrying them was shot down.
Every day will feel like Christmas.
This news bureau contains copyrighted material the use
of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of
environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and
social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of
any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US
Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on
this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes.