What a surprise, another "missing" piece of critical evidence: The illegal Iraq war cover-up continues however there is no statute of limitations on mass-murder; Bush, Blair, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, Powell, Franks, Feith, Wolfowitz, Betrayus, Perle, Perino et al. all headed for war crimes trials
RT
05/19/2015
The British inquiry into the 2003 Iraq War has hit a major stumbling block, as White House officials have been unable to find an “absolutely critical” letter sent by former Prime Minister Tony Blair to George W. Bush.
 |
Retarded murderer tries to sanitise Blair with phoney medal |
Although public hearings regarding the Iraq War's buildup have been finished since 2011, when exactly the publication of the Iraq Inquiry will occur remains unknown.
According to the Telegraph, the primary issue holding back the probe’s results is a debate over letters sent between Bush and Blair, one of which has reportedly gone missing.
The letter in question was originally penned by Blair in 2003 – before the UK’s House of Commons voted on whether or not to support an invasion – and allegedly stated, in its opening line, “You know, George, whatever you decide to do, I'm with you.”
 |
Bush war whore Perino - to prison |
Referred to as the “with you whatever” letter, inquiry leader Sir John Chilcot is looking to publish it alongside other Bush-Blair correspondence. Many have portrayed the letter as evidence of Blair offering Bush absolute and uncritical support for his desire to go to war, but the problem now is that White House officials say they can't find it.
“The lawyers are taking months to evaluate the letters and decide whether to release them,” the Telegraph stated. “However, they claim not to have been able to locate the ‘with you whatever’ letter.”
For his part, Blair has denied that the reported wording of his letter is accurate. The document’s contents were first brought to public attention in a book titled “The End of the Party,” by Andrew Rawnsley.
 |
Banging on the bongos like a chimpanzee: Drunken retard makes a fool of himself as thousands of U.S. military personnel die in the illegal Iraq war he started to seize oil resources |
This isn’t the first time that disputes over the Bush-Blair letters have been reported. Just last week, the Daily Mail reported that Chilcot wrote to the UK’s Home Office minister Norman Baker and confirmed that the delay is due to the fact that talks “about the disclosure of sensitive documents are not yet concluded.”
In response, Blair was blamed for holding up publication of the investigation – an allegation the former leader himself has dismissed.
 |
Bush responsible for THIS: "Mainstream media" frauds at Fox News now attempting to sanitise war criminals Bush and Cheney; will see their disgusting, illiterate Iraq war propaganda princess Dana Perino prosecuted for war crimes and imprisoned with her master Bush |
“The way the Blair government handled the Iraq war is perhaps the most shameful episode in the history of our democracy,” Baker said. “The fact Tony Blair appears now to be holding up the proper release of information is a disgrace.”
Government officials have stated that while they’re interested in publishing as much content as they can, they must also take into account national security concerns and weigh whether or not making these records public would affect the relationship between the US and UK going forward.
Speaking on the issue a couple of days later, British Prime Minister David Cameron said the wait has been “frustrating,” but added that publication should occur before 2014 is over.
“My understanding is that they will be able to publish before the end of the year and I very much hope they can deliver on that timetable,” he said, according to the Telegraph. “The public wants to see the answers of the inquiry and I think we shouldn’t have to wait too much longer.”
This news
bureau contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material
available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues,
etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.