Monday, September 16, 2013

Syria’s “Rebels” Threaten UN – Will Use U.S. Weapons

Read "Obama's CIA/FSA mercs" threaten UN

By Tony Cartalucci

Terrorists operating in Syria have threatened to “block” UN inspectors, any bloodshed will be on the hands of the US who is now openly arming them.

Moronic Obama still doesn't understand he is busted
 In Reuters’ “Syrian Rebels Slam U.S.-Russia Deal, Say Assad Is Moving Chemical Weapons To Lebanon And Iraq,” Qassim Saadeddine of the so-called “Free Syrian Army” rejected the recent Syrian-Russian proposal to turn over Syria’s chemical weapons for independent verification and destruction, vowing to block UN inspectors should they enter Syria to carry out the task.

Reuters reported:

Qassim Saadeddine, said: “Let the Kerry-Lavrov plan go to hell. We reject it and we will not protect the inspectors or let them enter Syria.”

In carrying out these overt threats, the terrorist front will be using US-provided arms, equipment and vehicles, as admitted by US officials in recent weeks. The Washington Post’s article, “U.S. weapons reaching Syrian rebels,” reported:

The CIA has begun delivering weapons to rebels in Syria, ending months of delay in lethal aid that had been promised by the Obama administration, according to U.S. officials and Syrian figures. The shipments began streaming into the country over the past two weeks, along with separate deliveries by the State Department of vehicles and other gear — a flow of material that marks a major escalation of the U.S. role in Syria’s civil war.

Obama's CIA/FSA mercs prepare to launch home-made chemical warhead
Of course, while this is the first openly admitted, direct military aid the US has provided terrorists operating within and along Syria’s borders, the US and its axis partners have been pouring fighters, weapons, and cash into Syria via Lebanon, NATO-member Turkey, Al Qaeda-saturated northern Iraq, and Jordan for over two years - intentionally into the hands of Al Qaeda and other sectarian extremists.

Not only is the US now openly admitting its role in purposefully perpetuating a clearly sectarian-driven conflict the US is documented to have itself engineered as early as 2007, it is also now responsible for the crimes carried out by these terrorists they are admittedly arming, including the harassment, obstruction, injury, capture, or death of UN inspectors and those charged with their protection.

Reports of sniper fire targeting UN inspectors attempting to investigate an alleged August 2013 chemical weapons attack in Damascus, Syria already give a troubling indication of the dangers future inspectors face amongst a landscape plagued with dangerous, lawless terrorists the West has purposefully empowered and is currently perpetuating in Syria.

Exposing America’s culpability in any attack upon UN weapon inspectors inoculates the public from fabricated justifications for future US military intervention based on the UN’s “failure,” including plans to use US troops to “secure” Syrian chemical weapons. Realizing that the Syrian-Russian plan is already in the process of being purposely sabotaged by US support for terrorists within Syria ensures that America is excluded entirely from participating in any future solution to the Syrian crisis, or any other crisis for that matter.

Any opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The 5th Estate.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.  We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Obama Says Iran Shouldn’t Misinterpret U.S. Response To Syria

Syrian "crisis" now by magic gives way to renewed Obama "Iran crisis" - when will Americans and the world put a stop to these ludicrous, fake attempts to distract from the crimes of the White House criminals?

By Zachary Goldfarb

Obama declared that the United States is still prepared to act militarily to stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons despite the decision to pursue a diplomatic deal and not strike Syria over its alleged use of chemical weapons.
Syria, N. Korea, Iran:  More ludicrous lies
 He also acknowledged that his approach to the Syria crisis has been uneven, but defended it as producing the right results.

Obama spoke in an interview broadcast Sunday on ABC’s “This Week With George Stephanopoulos,” taped Friday before the United States and Russia agreed on a plan to bring Syrian chemical weapons under international control in order to avoid military strikes.

But Obama said Iran should not interpret the diplomatic response — coming after he threatened to use strikes — as suggesting that the United States wouldn’t attack Iran to stop the development of nuclear weapons.

“I think what the Iranians understand is that the nuclear issue is a far larger issue for us than the chemical weapons issue, that the threat . . . against Israel that a nuclear Iran poses is much closer to our core interests,” Obama said. “My suspicion is that the Iranians recognize they shouldn’t draw a lesson that we haven’t struck [Syria] to think we won’t strike Iran.”
Snowden revelations direct cause of "crises"
Obama said, however, that what the Iranians should draw from this episode is that it is possible to resolve this type of disagreement diplomatically.

“My view is that if you have both a credible threat of force, combined with a rigorous diplomatic effort, that, in fact you can . . . strike a deal,” he said, confirming that he had communicated with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani by letter.

Obama also defended his approach to the Syrian crisis, acknowledging that it has been turbulent, but insisting that it has achieved the right results.

The comments come after a number of lawmakers and foreign policy experts on both sides of the aisle have criticized Obama for first making the case to go to war in Syria, then deciding to ask Congress for approval, and then making the case for strikes to a prime-time audience while also announcing that he would first give a Russian diplomatic proposal a chance to work.

In response to those criticisms, Obama said he is less interested in style than results.
White House criminal still dancing to nutcase Netanyahu's tune
“I think that folks here in Washington like to grade on style. And so had we rolled out something that was very smooth and disciplined and linear, they would have graded it well, even if it was a disastrous policy. We know that, because that’s exactly how they graded the Iraq war,” Obama said.

He added, “I’m much more concerned about getting the policy right. . . . As a consequence of the steps that we’ve taken over the last two weeks to three weeks, we now have a situation in which Syria has acknowledged it has chemical weapons, has said it’s willing to join the convention on chemical weapons, and Russia, its primary sponsor, has said that it will pressure Syria to reach that agreement. That’s my goal. And if that goal is achieved, then it sounds to me like we did something right.”

Obama also played down differences with Russian President Vladi­mir Putin as Russia and the United States work together to resolve the Syria standoff.
Lurch, Hague have asses handed to them by laughing Putin
“Mr. Putin and I have strong disagreements on a whole range of issues,” Obama said. “But I can talk to him. We have worked together on important issues. . . . This is not the Cold War. This is not a contest between the United States and Russia.”

Obama plans to pivot back to a focus on the economy this week ahead of major fiscal battles in Congress, and he said he could change the direction of the economy — including the upward path of inequality — if Congress would let him.

Asked if a president just couldn’t stop inequality, he responded, “I think the president can stop it. The problem is that there continues to be a major debate here in Washington.”

While he acknowledged that government can’t overcome every trend in the market, policy that invests in the economy “pushes against these trends. And the problem that we’ve got right now is you’ve got a portion of Congress whose policies don’t just want to you know, leave things alone; they actually want to accelerate these trends.”

Any opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The 5th Estate.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.  We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Faking It : How The Media Manipulates The World Into War

"Mainstream media" and it's lackey U.S. spy "journalists" will ultimately face war crimes trials right along with their Obama/Bushite masters

 By James Corbett

This GRTV production by James Corbett was first released in January 2012. In the light of the recent media disinformation campaign in relation to Syria, we bring this carefully researched video-documentary report to the attention of GR readers. 

As the drums of war begin to beat once again in IranSyria, the South China Sea, and other potential hotspots and flashpoints around the globe, concerned citizens are asking how a world so sick of bloodshed and a population so tired of conflict could be led to this spot once again.

To understand this seeming paradox, we must first understand the centuries-long history of how media has been used to whip the nation into wartime frenzy, dehumanize the supposed enemies, and even to manipulate the public into believing in causes for war that, decades later, were admitted to be completely fictitious.

As the US and Iranian governments escalate tensions in the already volatile Straits of Hormuz, and China and Russia begin openly questioning Washington’s interference in their internal politics, the world remains on a knife-edge of military tension. Far from being a dispassionate observer of these developments, however, the media has in fact been central to increasing those tensions and preparing the public to expect a military confrontation. But as the online media rises to displace the traditional forms by which the public forms its understanding of the world, many are now beginning to see first hand how the media lies the public into war.…

"Mainstream media" and their fraud "journalists" will face war crimes trials
The term “yellow journalism” was coined to describe the type of sensationalistic, scandal-driven, and often erroneous style of reporting popularized by newspapers like William Randolph Hearst’s New York Journal. In one of the most egregious examples of this phenomenon, Hearst’s papers widely trumpeted the sinking of the Maine as the work of the Spanish. Whipped into an anti-Spanish frenzy by a daily torrent of stories depicting Spanish forces’ alleged torture and rape of Cubans, and pushed over the edge by the Maine incident, the public welcomed the beginning of the US-Spanish war. Although it is now widely believed that the explosion on the Maine was due to a fire in one of its coal bunkers, the initial lurid reports of Spanish involvement stuck and the nation was led into war.

In many ways, the phrase infamously attributed to Hearst in reply to his illustrator “You furnish the pictures and I’ll furnish the war,” apocryphal as the story may be, nevertheless perfectly encodes the method by which the public would be led to war time and again through the decades. 

The US was drawn into World War I by the sinking of the Lusitania, a British ocean liner carrying American passengers that was torpedoed by German U-boats off the coast of Ireland, killing over 1,000 of its passengers. What the public was not informed about at the time, of course, was that just one week before the incident, then-First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill had written to the President of the Board of Trade that it was “most important to attract neutral shipping to our shores, in the hopes especially of embroiling the United States with Germany.” Nor did reports of the attack announce that the ship was carrying rifle ammunition and other military supplies. Instead, reports once again emphasized that the attack was an out-of-the-blue strike by a maniacal enemy, and the public was led into the war. 

Enter the term "yellow journalism" in the Encyclopedia Britannica and one of the first entries you will see is William Randolph Hearst
The US involvement in World War II was likewise the result of deliberate disinformation. Although the Honolulu Advertiser had even predicted the attack on Pearl Harbor days in advance, the Japanese Naval codes had already been decipheredby that time, and that even Henry Stimson, the US Secretary of War, had noted in his diary the week before that he had discussed in a meeting with Roosevelt “how we should maneuver them [the Japanese] into the position of firing the first shot without allowing too much danger to ourselves,” the public were still led to believe that the Pearl Harbor attack had been completely unforeseen. Just last month, a newly-declassified memo emerged showing that FDR had been warned of an impending Japanese attack on Hawaii just three days before the events at Pearl Harbor, yet the history books still portray Pearl Harbor as an example of a surprise attack.

In August 1964, the public was told that the North Vietnamese had attacked a US Destroyer in the Gulf of Tonkin on two separate occasions. The attacks were portrayed as a clear example of “communist aggression” and a resolution was soon passed in Congress authorizing President Johnson to begin deploying US forces in Vietnam. In 2005, an internal NSA study was released concluding that the second attack in fact never took place. In effect, 60000 American servicemen and as many as three million Vietnamese, let alone as many as 500,000 Cambodians and Laotians, lost their lives because of an incident that did not occur anywhere but in the imagination of the Johnson administration and the pages of the American media

Obama/CIA owned and operated Al Jazeera the yellowest of the yellow
In 1991, the world was introduced to the emotional story of Nayirah, a Kuwaiti girl who testified about the atrocities committed by Iraqi forces in Kuwait.

What the world was never told was that the incident had in fact been the work of a public relations firm, Hill and Knowltown, and the girl had actually been the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador. Once again, the public was whipped into a frenzy of hatred for the Hussein regime, not for the documented atrocities that it had actually committed on segments of its own population with weapons supplied to them by the United States itself, but on the basis of an imaginary story told to the public via their televisions, orchestrated by a pr firm.

In the lead-up to the war on Iraq, the American media infamously took the lead in framing the debate about the Iraqi government’s weapons of mass destruction NOT as a question of whether or not they even existed, but as a question of where they had been hidden and what should be done to disarm them. The New York Times led the way with Judith Miller‘s now infamous reporting on the Iraqi WMD story, now known to have been based on false information from untrustworthy sources, but the rest of the media fell into line with the NBC Nightly News asking “what precise threat Iraq and its weapons of mass destruction pose to America”, and Time debating whether Hussein was “making a good-faith effort to disarm Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction.” Reports about chemical weapons stashes were reported on before they were confirmed, although headlines boldly asserted their existence as indisputable fact. We now know that in fact the stockpiles did not exist, and the administration premeditatedly lied the country into yet another war, but the most intense opposition the Bush administration ever received over this documented war crime was some polite correction on the Sunday political talk show circuit. 

Remarkably, the public at large has seemingly learned nothing from all of these documented historical manipulations. If anything, the media has become even bolder in its attempts to manipulate the public’s perceptions, perhaps emboldened by the fact that so few in the audience seem willing to question the picture that is being painted for them on the evening news.

Later that year, CNN aired footage of a bombed out Tskhinvali in South Ossetia, falsely labeling it as footage of Gori, which they said had been attacked by the Russians.

In 2009, the BBC showed a cropped image of a rally in Iran which they claimed was a crowd of protesters who assembled to show their opposition to the Iranian government. An uncropped version of the same photograph displayed on the LA Times’ website, however, revealed that the photo in fact came from a rally in support of Ahmedinejad.

In August of 2011, the BBC ran footage of what they claimed was a celebration in Tripoli’s Green Square. When sharp-eyed viewers noticed that the flags in the footage were in fact Indian flags, the BBC was forced to admit that they had “accidentally” broadcast footage from India instead of Tripoli.

Also that month, CNN reported on a story from the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights claiming that eight infants in incubators had died in a hospital in Hama when Syrian authorities cut off power in the area. Some news sites evencarried pictures of the infants. The images were later admitted to have been taken in Egypt and no evidence has ever emerged to back up the accusations.

As breathtaking as all of these lies, manipulations and so-called “mistakes” are, they in and of themselves don’t represent the only functions of the media for the war machine. Now, the US government is taking the lead in becoming more and more directly involved with the shaping of the media message on war propaganda, and the general public is becoming even more ensnared in a false picture of the world through the Pentagon’s own lens.

In 2005, the Bush White House admitted to producing videos that were designed to look like news reports from legitimate independent journalists, and then feeding those reports to media outlets as prepackaged material ready to air on the evening news. When the Government Accountability Office ruled that these fake news reports in fact constituted illegal covert propaganda, the White House simply issued a memo declaring the practice to be legal.

In April 2008, the New York Times revealed a secret US Department of Defense program that was launched in 2002 and involved using retired military officers to implant Pentagon talking points in the media. The officers were presented as “independent analysts” on talk shows and news programs, although they had been specially briefed beforehand by the Pentagon. In December of 2011, the DoD’s own Inspector General released a report concluding that the program was in perfect compliance with government policies and regulations.

Earlier this year, it was revealed the the US government had contracted with HBGary Federal to develop software that create fake social media accounts in order to steer public opinion and promote propaganda on popular websites. The federal contract for the software sourced back to the MacDill Air Force Base in Florida.

As the vehicle through which information from the outside world is captured, sorted, edited and transmitted into our homes, the mass media has the huge responsibility of shaping and informing our understanding of events to which we don’t have first-hand access. This is an awesome responsibility in even the most ideal conditions, with diligent reporters guided by trustworthy editors doing their level best to report the most important news in the most straightforward way.

But in a media landscape where a handful of companies own virtually all of the print, radio and television media in each nation, the only recourse the public has is to turn away from the mainstream media altogether. And that is precisely what is happening.

As study after study and report after report has shown, the death of the old media has accelerated in recent years, with more and more people abandoning newspapers and now even television as their main source of news. Instead, the public is increasingly turning toward online sources for their news and information, something that is necessarily worrying for the war machine itself, a system that can only truly flourish when the propaganda arm is held under monopolistic control.

But as citizens turn away from the New York Times and toward independent websites, many run and maintained by citizen journalists and amateur editors, the system that has consolidated its control over the minds of the public for generations seems to finally be showing signs that it may not be invincible.

Surely this is not to say that online media is impervious to the defects that have made the traditional media so unreliable. Quite the contrary. But the difference is that online, there is still for the time being relative freedom of choice at the individual level. While internet freedom exists, individual readers and viewers don’t have to take the word of any website or pundit or commentator on any issue. They can check the source documentation themselves, except, perhaps not coincidentally, on the websites of the traditional media bastions, which tend not to link source material and documentation in their articles.

Hence the SOPA Act, Protect IP, the US government’s attempts to seize websites at the domain name level, and all of the other concerted attacks we have seen on internet freedoms in recent years.

Because ultimately, an informed and engaged public is far less likely to go along with wars waged for power and profit. And as the public becomes better informed about the very issues that the media has tried to lie to them about for so long, they realize that the answer to all of the mainstream media’s war cheerleading and blatant manipulation is perhaps simpler than we ever suspected: All we have to do is turn them off.

Any opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The 5th Estate.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.  We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.


Negotiating With Syria But Not Iran Is Hypocrisy

Fast running out of "enemies," Obama Iran "crisis" next on the menu; White House perpetual fear-mongering and never ending "crises" a pathetic attempt to deflect from ongoing Snowden revelations - and the entire world knows it    

By Dallas Darling

"For neither man nor angel can discern Hypocrisy, the only evil that walks Invisible, except to God alone." -John Milton, "Paradise Lost."
Muslims in Iran hold vigil to honor those killed on 9/11 and to support America (September, 2001 – back when the world supported us)
Despite having toppled Iran's popularly elected leader, Mohammad Mosaddeq, and then initiated a reign of terror that imprisoned, tortured, and killed thousands of political and religious opponents; after 9-11 both Iran's ReligiousLeader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and Iran's President, Mohammed Khatami, condemned the attacks in no uncertain terms, offering unconditional support and all kinds of economic and medical assistance.

Regardless of militarily aiding and encouraging Iraq's President Saddam Hussein to invade their country, resulting in hundreds of thousands of casualties, including assisting Hussein in using chemical weapons against them; millions of Iranians held vigils for the 9-11 victims, even as some in the Arab world cheered the attacks and vowed to do the same. Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad later prayed and laid a wreath at the site. 
Iranians throw flowers in the Persian Gulf to mark the 24th anniversary of the downing of Iran Air Flight 655 by the US navy, in the port city of Bandar Abbas on July 2, 2012
Although the U.S. and one of its warships, the USS Vincennes, shot down an Iranian civilian airliner over the Persian Gulf in Iranian waters, killing all 295 passengers and crew members including 66 children; years later Iran helped the U.S.-led coalition against Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda in Afghanistan
They have also offered the U.S. military intelligence assistance in helping to defeat terrorists in the region.

In spite of continued economic sanctions against Iranians, even crippling some aspects of their economy; when the U.S. preemptively invaded Iraq and then militarily occupied it, and as Iraq was undergoing sectarian violence with hundreds being killed on a weekly basis, Iranians offered to assist in substantial peace talks. They provided humanitarian aid for millions of refugees too that had resulted from the U.S. invasion.

In spite of corporate and military lobbies continually pressuring the U.S. Congress and the President to declare war on Iran, even wanting to again invade and re-occupying it; after the BP Gulf Oil spill Iran offered technical assistance and aid. Iran has also offered numerous conciliatory solutions in resolving the U.S.'s unconditional stance that it must cease nuclear enrichment, even if it is only being used for civilian purposes.

Even though Israeli lobbies and religious organizations meet regularly with congressional and executive members to try and persuade them to dismantle Iran, and even though Israel is the only nation in the region that has a nuclear armory and acts like overlords to three million Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza; Iran's benign relationship with the Jews stretching from antiquity until now is never recognized.

Hypocrisy is the false claim of having admirable principles and beliefs. It is expecting others to behave with higher moral standards than one's own self. It is also a form of lying and a moral lapse, especially since it takes great effort and conscious endeavors to deceive others. Most important and since it assumes that individuals and nations represent themselves as they really are, hypocrisy is a breach of trust.

Negotiating with Syria over its chemical and biological weapons programs but not with Iran is pure hypocrisy. With Iran, American Exceptionalism has more often been American Exclusion and American Hypocrisy. Given the U.S.'s shady and brutal past in dealing with Iran and its people, the U.S. not only owes Iran a new era of peaceful dialogues and negotiations, but a new era of apologies.

Sadly, U.S. hypocrisy and its invisibility-at least to many Americans-towards Iran has caused many possible paradises to be lost.

Dallas Darling (

Dallas Darling is the author of Politics 501: An A-ZReading on Conscientious Political Thought and Action, Some NationsAbove God: 52 Weekly Reflections On Modern-Day Imperialism, Militarism, And Consumerism in the Context of John's Apocalyptic Vision, and The Other Side Of Christianity: Reflections on Faith, Politics, Spirituality, History, and Peace. He is a correspondent for You can read more of Dallas' writings at and

Any opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The 5th Estate.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.  We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Saudi Arabia Behind Armed Terrorism In Iraq : Former Iraqi Official

Saudi Arabia dictatorship will be the next U.S. domino to fall in Middle East


Iraq’s former national security advisor says Saudi Arabia is one of the major supporters of armed terrorism, plaguing the violence-stricken country.

Iraqi security personnel are seen at the site of a bomb attack in Kirkuk, 290 km north of Baghdad
Mowaffak al-Rubaie said that all leaders of terrorist groups operating inside Iraq have come to the country from foreign states such as Saudi Arabia and Yemen, noting that Baghdad has managed to identify them.

Rubaie further noted that over 1,000 Iraqi tribal sheikhs have recently rejected an invitation by Saudi King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz to attend a meeting in Riyadh, describing it as interference in Iraq’s domestic affairs.

Recently, cables were released about a secret memo by Christopher Hill, former US ambassador to Iraq, sent to the US Department of State in September 2009, in which it was mentioned, “Saudi Arabia constitutes the biggest challenge and the problem is more complex in relation to the Iraqi politicians who are trying to form a stable and independent government.”

Hill also said “intelligence sources reported that Saudi Arabia is based in the effort to destabilize the government of [Iraqi] Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.”

Violence has surged across Iraq in recent months, reaching its highest level since 2008.

According to the United Nations, more than 800 people have been killed across Iraq in various acts of terrorism in August alone.

UN figures also say that over 4,000 people have died in terrorist attacks in Iraq so far in 2013, with Baghdad province hit worst.


HERE is what Saudi apostates do with YOUR GAS MONEY:

Any opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The 5th Estate.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.  We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.


NSA Spies On Google?

In truth, it’s vice-versa and worse

By Yoichi Shimatsu

Recent disclosures that Google has been siphoning off jet fuel subsidized by the Pentagon for private flights around the world from its home base at Moffett Airfield should be setting off alarm bells at the CIA, NSA and FBI Counter-Intelligence office. Located in Sunnyvale near Google headquarters, the Ames Research Center at Moffett Field is a major hub for NSA satellite communication intercepts and top-secret satellite-technology research. These crown jewels of American intelligence capability are completely vulnerable to Google’s decryption, hacking and password theft, which have been proven in spades by the Snowden disclosures. 
The massive hangar at Moffett Field, California
The fleet of 7 jets and 2 helicopters owned by Google’s Eric Schmidt, Larry Page and Sergey Brin routinely lands and takes off at the former naval-intelligence airfield since 2007. Ostensibly there to promote the mapping of the skies for educational purposes, its paltry research in glamor projects like Google Mars and the lack of new products have been criticized by NASA administrators.

Google’s interests are apparently directed elsewhere inside Moffett, which hosts uplinks with NSA (National Security Agency) communication-intercepts satellites and spy-telescope image-processing. In addition to intelligence data, the Ames Research Center also sponsors research critical for space-based warfare, including infrared detection (used to track vehicles, rocket launches and chemical releases), spectrograph imaging, high-speed flight simulators, and cloud computing on the ultrafast 10-petaflops supercomputer called Pleides.
Technion institute
The no-tax fuel deal with the Pentagon and landing rights at U.S. military bases cast a stark light on the web giant’s connections with the foreign intelligence activities of the Israeli Defense Force (IDF). The huge flow of technology transfers between Google and the IDF, along with the Brin-Page sponsored R&D labs at the Technion institute in Haifa and Tel Aviv are, simply put, industrial espionage and military spying on a massive scale far more extensive than the secret codes stolen by the American Jewish spy Jonathan Pollard.

Israeli’s War against the World

How can these allegations be stated with such certainty? Well, it’s not only because Sen. Charles Grassley is conducting an investigation into the nitty-gritty details of how cash-rich Google managed to wrangle such a plum deal from the NASA-Pentagon bureaucrats. Not just because of NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden. It’s also because computers at Moffett Field were used to probe and hack this website, The 5th Estate. The mystery of how Google managed to send viruses to burn out the site servers in Jakarta is now solved. Mssrs. Schmidt, Brin and Page, whenever you start a war, prepare for defeat.
General Zvi Kaplan
On top of Google’s classified research cooperation with NASA, Israel’s military-run space force is involved with the U.S. Lunar Science Institute at Moffett. The insertion of Israeli defense personnel into the American space program is run by General Zvi Kaplan, director general of the Israeli Space Agency. His close colleague Haim Eshed is in charge of space war at the Israel Defense Ministry. Previously, Kaplan worked as plasma physicist and laser specialist at the Soreq Nuclear Research Center in Yavne on the outskirts of Tel Aviv.

Israeli testing of lasers to intercept ballistic-missile launches was the real cause of the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster in 2003. Aboard the ill-fated ship was Israeli Air Force hero Ilan Ramon, the pilot who led the bombing raid against Iraq’s nuclear reactor. Just prior to the U.S. invasion of Iraq, the IDF installed Ramon onto the NASA shuttle to test laser-based systems for infrared telescope detection of Iraqi Scud launchers and to artificially create water spouts off the coast of Cyprus, successfully causing cold weather over the Mediterranean and Arabian Peninsula.

Ramon’s third experiment on the Columbia's last orbit was the laser-gun shoot-down of a missile rising over the White Sands Test Range. The massive power surge overheated the americium-242 generator, blowing up the fuel tanks of the SS Columbia, killing all crew members and scientists. After losing the entire shuttle team due to Israeli incompetence, it is astounding that NASA continued to cooperate with the Israelis.
Space Shuttle Columbia burns up on 2003
Besides the sale of faulty technology to the Pentagon, Israel’s defense industry is a major supplier of weapons-related electronic systems worldwide, much of it stolen from U.S. laboratories, to a wide range of customers, including those hostile to American interests. The most threatening of Israeli clients, as far as Americans are concerned, is North Korea, which is rapidly modernizing its ballistic missile and nuclear warheads targeted against U.S. cities.
The recent visit to Pyongyang by Google chairman Eric Schmidt and double-agent Jared Cohen of Google Ideas was aimed at upgrading Kim Jong Un’s computer system, which is vital to weapons design, plutonium enrichment and rocket ballistics. Google’s links with North Korea are reinforced by its business alliances with SoftBank, whose CEO Masayoshi Son is a fund manager for the North Korean business community (pachinko gambling, horse racing, extortion, drug trafficking) in Japan. Together, Son and Schmidt have funded dodgy media projects in China and Vice TV, which hosted Dennis Rodman’s house calls to Kim Un Il in Pyongyang.

Klaus Fuchs as Ancestor

Most Americans have heard about Google’s snooping activities with its Street View vehicles that eavesdrop on wireless Internet signals to capture passwords. Something similar is happening with advanced defense technology. By insinuating their operatives inside Moffett-Ames lab, the Google-IDF network has succeeded in penetrating America’s most sensitive research programs involving space-based weapons development, satellite imagery, strong encryption and cloud computing. 
Google spy car: Why Americans allowed THIS is inexplicable
In the Cold War, America’s main adversary, the Soviet Union, relied on atomic spies like the German Jewish physicist Klaus Fuchs to heist nuclear secrets from Los Alamos. The Jewish spy network received funding and legal support from the Zionist movement in its strategy to diminish American power in the postwar era by playing off Moscow and Washington. Since its founding in 1948, the State of Israel has methodically built up its nuclear forces, missile arsenal and weapons industry by stealing technology at the expense of the U.S., Britain, France and Russia.

Israel’s fundamentally anti-American global policy has prompted transfers of nuclear, missile, aerospace and bioweapons technology to apartheid South Africa, China and North Korea. Thanks to Israeli weapons technology, Kim Un Jong’s ravings about aiming his sights on Washington D.C. and wiping out American cities are no longer an idle threat or fantasy. Until they decide to revoke their American citizenship, the treacherous team of Brin, Page and Schmidt are not just guilty of intellectual property theft, security breaches and espionage – their higher crime is treason.

Mecha Warrior, Kabbalist Nightmare

NASA maintains extensive research cooperation with nearby Stanford University, former home base of Google vice-president Sebastian Thrun. An expert in artificial intelligence and robotics, the German computer professor co-invented Street View and the Google self-driving car, a drone on wheels, thanks to generous funding from DARPA. The Pentagon agency has a notorious fixation on the human-robot interface, which will someday put robo-cops on the streets and mecha warriors battling in space, on land and under the seas.
Google, Wendy Seltzer of "Chilling Effects" and a herd of Harvard lawyers originally used DARPA to take down The 5th Estate in 2012
Ames NASA sponsors the super-secret artificial intelligence and human-centered systems projects, the key components for trans-human mecha-warrior robots, as visualized in the movie “Pacific Rim” and anime Evangelion”. As its plot thickens, the Japanese animation series discloses a secret organization called Seele (Soul) inside the militarist space directorate NERV. The sci-fi epic offers profound insights into the Zionist fixation on controlling outer space, based on Kabbalist occultism and messianic prophecy. The goal is to take over the planet and even the solar system for the final apocalyptic annihilation of the human race. That is the master plan of evil genius.

The conclusion is clear to those who are still human: The ghouls of Google and their Frankenstein inventions must be stopped.
Yoichi Shimatsu is a Hong Kong-based science writer and the former Editor of the Japan Times Weekly in Tokyo. 



The real truth on 9/11 slowly continues to bleed out

Technical experts are mounting major challenges to official U.S. government accounts of how three World Trade Center skyscrapers collapsed in near-freefall after the 9/11 attacks 15 years ago.

Many researchers are focusing especially on the little-known collapse of



The Geopolitics Of The United States, Part 1: The Inevitable Empire

The Empire and the inevitable fall of the Obama criminal regime

STRATFOR Editor’s Note: This installment on the United States, presented in two parts, is the 16th in a series of STRATFOR monographs on the geopolitics of countries influential in world affairs.

Like nearly all of the peoples of North and South America, most Americans are not originally from the territory that became the United States.



Geopolitics Of The United States Part 2: American Identity And The Threats of Tomorrow

A look back at 2011 predictions for the future in order to put events of today into perspective

 photo capitalism_zpsah78uy5p.jpg
We have already discussed in the first part of this analysis how the American geography dooms whoever controls the territory to being a global power, but there are a number of other outcomes that shape what that power will be like. The first and most critical is the impact of that geography on the American mindset.



By Robert S. Finnegan

This e-mail outlines and confirms the acts of espionage against Indonesia and Indonesians by Akiko Makino and the others involved both in Kobe University and in AI Lab at University of Airlangga, Surabaya; Bahasa Indonesia original follows English translation...



UPDATED 01/07/2015 : New Analysis Challenges Tamiflu Efficacy; Hong Kong Corona Virus Outbreak


 photo TAMIFLU_small_zpssojx6okt.jpg

Obama criminals now resulting to biowarfare in quest to destroy Chinese and ASEAN economy; "novel virus substrain" points directly to a Kawaoka / Fouchier / Ernala-Ginting Kobe lab virus weaponized and genetically altered to specifically target and infect the Asian population: Ribavirin...



 photo WHO02_zpsplmhtlpr.jpg
The 5th Estate has just purchased a library on H5N1 "Novel" virus pandemics, there are dozens of PDF and Exel documents we feel will assist you in saving lives following intentional releases of the H5N1 and now MERS viruses; we will begin by printing those that appear to be extremely relevant here: H5N1 Kobe-Kawaoka-Ernala series continues soon with more "Smoking Gun" e-mails from Teridah Ernala to The 5th Estate . . .



By Robert S. Finnegan

On October 12, 2002 the Indonesian island of Bali experienced a terrorist attack that rocked the world. It was unquestionably well-coordinated and executed, the largest in the country's history.