Despite his desperate, maniacal plan to start WWIII in Syria, the Obama criminals cannot possibly erase all the evidence of the CIA/FSA chemical weapons attacks using U.S./Qatar supplied munitions; war criminals Blair, Obama, Cameron will face justice in the Hague
Huffington Post
08/27/2012
Tony Blair has demanded Britain and the United States intervene in
the Syrian civil war, warning that the regime of Bashar al-Assad is
launching an attack on civilians on a scale "not seen since the dark
days of Saddam".
The former prime minister who led Britain to war in Iraq an Afghanistan said it was "time we took a side". Writing in
The Times
on Tuesday, Blair said: "People wince at the thought of intervention.
But contemplate the future consequence of inaction and shudder."
He said: "Western policy is at a crossroads: commentary or action;
shaping events or reacting to them. After the long and painful campaigns
in Iraq and Afghanistan, I understand every impulse to stay clear of
the turmoil, to watch but not to intervene, to ratchet up language but
not to engage in the hard, even harsh business of changing reality on
the ground. But we have collectively to understand the consequences of
wringing our hands instead of putting them to work."
 |
Blair gets bogus "peace" medal from fellow war criminal Bush |
In an apparent reference to Russian support for the regime, he added:
"Others are taking sides. They’re not terrified of the prospect of
intervention. They’re intervening. To support an assault on civilians
not seen since the dark days of Saddam."
President Obama and David Cameron have raised expectations that the
West is preparing to take military action against Assad - having accused
him of
using chemical weapons.
But there is nervousness in Westminster that the British government
may take part in an air campaign before it is sanctioned by parliament -
which does not return from summer recess until Monday. Cameron will
decide today whether or not to recall MPs to the Commons early,
potentially as soon as Wednesday.
The Labour Party has demanded that MPs be given a chance to voice
their opinion on any military intervention. Ed Miliband has not yet set
out a clear view on whether he would support air strikes.
 |
Obama, UK, Qatar CIA/FSA mercs responsible for chemical attacks in Syria |
|
A substantial number of Conservative MPs are opposed to intervening
in the conflict and have long insisted parliament be given the chance to
veto any military moves.
Andrew Bridgen told The Huffington Post UK on Monday evening that he
suspected a "large proportion" of Tory MPs remained to be convinced by
the arguments for starting another "shooting war in the Middle East".
"We are fortunate we live a parliamentary democracy, not a
dictatorship. Parliament should be recalled," he said. "I think it's for
the foreign secretary and the prime minister to come to the Despatch
Box and persuade the House of the need [for intervention]."
 |
Americans will be held responsible by the international community for Obama's bombings, and had better be prepared for more of THIS |
Earlier this year the North West Leicestershire MP
organised a letter signed by 81 other Tories urging Cameron to grant a vote before any action was taken.
In something of an understatement, Bridgen said given past assurances
from the government that there would be a vote, the failure to hold one
would provoke "consternation" among backbenchers.
His view was shared by Peterborough MP Stewart Jackson. The backbencher,
who is also sceptical
about the wisdom of intervention, told HuffPost UK: "I back a recall of
parliament and there must be a debate and vote before any substantive
UK involvement in the civil war."
Cameron is due to chair a meeting of the National Security Council
(NSC) on Wednesday to discuss potential responses to the deadly attack
after breaking off his family holiday in Cornwall to return to Downing
Street. Nick Clegg has also cancelled a trip to Afghanistan to attend
the meeting.
On Monday evening US secretary of state
John Kerry said
evidence of the use of chemical weapons was already "real and
compelling" and indicated further evidence would be unveiled soon.
In an emotive address that ratcheted up the rhetoric against Assad,
Kerry laid the blame for the attack at the feet of the regime and said
it was a "moral obscenity" that "should shock the conscience of the
world".
Soon after, White House press secretary Jay Carney told reporters
there was "very little doubt that the Syrian regime is responsible for
this attack" and that Obama was "assessing a potential response".
Carney said: "All of us who have seen the physical evidence are
repulsed by it. Indiscriminate killing of innocent women and children in
an attempt to maintain his bloody grip on power is despicable, but
that's what we have come to expect from Bashar al-Assad."
In London, Downing Street said Cameron told Russian president
Vladimir Putin on Monday that there was "little doubt that this was an
attack carried out by the Syrian regime."
Any opinions expressed here are those of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of The 5th
Estate.
This news site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not
always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such
material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental,
political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice
issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.