Biden Readies Casus Belli For War, Saying Syria Used Chemical Weapons

Taking time out from killing innocent Afghan, Pakistani and Yemeni women and children in CIA drone strikes, drooling Obama mummy Biden emerges from sarcophagus to ape master's bogus Syria gas claims;  Biden will be present in the dock at the New Hague War Crimes Trials along with Obama, Clinton, Kerry, Panetta, Gates, Hagel, Rice, Carney, Cameron and the fraud "journalists" of U.S. owned and operated war-shilling CIA Al Jazeera   

PRESS TV
08/28/2013

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden says there is no doubt that the Syrian government is responsible for the use of chemical weapons near Damascus, appearing to prepare the ground for a U.S. military offensive against the Arab country.  "There's no doubt who is responsible for this heinous use of chemical weapons in Syria: the Syrian regime," Biden said in the US city of Houston on Tuesday.

Biden is right:  There is no doubt it was Obama's CIA/FSA mercs

In the last few days, US officials have repeatedly referred to “surgical strikes” on Syrian military installations while discussing US military options for Syria.

The call for military action against Syria intensified after foreign-backed opposition forces accused the government of President Bashar al-Assad of launching a chemical attack on militant strongholds in the suburbs of Damascus last week.

On August 21, Syria's opposition claimed that around 1,300 people were killed in the attack in the Damascus suburbs of Ain Tarma, Zamalka and Jobar.

But the Syrian Army strongly rejected any role in the alleged chemical attack, saying the accusations were fabricated to distract a visiting team of the UN chemical weapons experts and to cover up militants' losses.

Syria attack attempted cover for Benghazigate, among others

During a news conference on Tuesday in Damascus, Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Muallem challenged the United States and its allies to present evidence that the government had used chemical weapons.

"We are hearing war drums around us. If they want to launch an attack against Syria, I think using the excuse of chemical weapons is not true at all. I challenge them to show what proof they have,” Muallem said.

He also stated that any military action against Syria would serve the interests of Israel and al-Qaeda-linked militants fighting against the Syrian government.

"The war effort led by the United States and their allies will serve the interests of Israel and secondly al-Nusra Front," the Syrian foreign minister noted.

Propaganda Minister Carney headed for prison with his master

Meanwhile, White House spokesman Jay Carney said that President Barack Obama was still undecided about launching a military strike, saying that Washington was not considering "boots on the ground" in Syria.

However, France and Israel, among other opponents of the Syrian government, are pushing for a US offensive against Syria.

Russia urged the West not to jump to conclusions on the chemical weapons attack, and await the findings of the UN inspection team that on Monday examined the area in the Damascus suburbs.

American public headed for more of THIS, WWIII

All countries should wait for the results of the probe and "show prudence and avoid tragic mistakes" by jumping to conclusions about the incident, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said on Sunday.

"Our American and European partners must understand what catastrophic consequences this kind of politics would have for the region, for the Arab and Islamic world as a whole," Lukashevich said, advising the West to avoid military action against Syria.

GJH/MHB


 

Any opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The 5^th Estate.

This news site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.  We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Read more »

'NATO Behind Houla Massacre:" Children Deliberately Targeted - Videos

Read:  "CIA Behind Houla Massacre;"  Hypocrite Obama State Department shills more concerned about CIA getting busted than children's murders    

PRESS TV
05/30/2012

The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) has said that most of the civilian victims of last week’s massacre in the Syrian town of Houla were executed. 

CIA has been operating in Syria for decades

Over 100 civilians were killed in a massacre in the western town of Houla on May 25. 

Meanwhile, a number of Western governments have recalled their ambassadors and high-ranking diplomats from Syria in protest to the killing of at least 108 people. 

The Syrian government says that the chaos is being orchestrated from outside the country and that security forces have been given clear instructions not to harm civilians. 

Press TV has conducted an interview with Syed Ali Wasif, from the Society for International Reforms and Research, to hear his opinion on this issue. The following is a rough transcription of the interview. 

Press TV: First of all I like to get your opinion on the double standard being adopted by the international community, by and large when it comes to Syria specifically with regards to this Houla massacre where most of the civilians were killed at point-blank range and not by the artillery and tanks as many claimed? 

Wasif: Well unfortunately yes there is a double standard when it comes to the interest of NATO and pro-Western allies. So this is exactly the case in Syria going on today. What happened is alarming. 

Actually this was a premeditated, pre-orchestrated component of the NATO foreign policy actually or what you can call it an alliance of the US, Israel and Saudi Arabia with regard to this premeditated action and this murder, killing a hundred people there. 

How could the Syrian government kill its own people when they represent basically the Alawites and those people there were mainly Alawites and all other pro-Syrian people? 

Straight out of a cheap U.S. horror movie:  Houla residents appear about to be chain-sawed, which is uniquely American

So how could a government kill its own people? 

So this is totally ridiculous. But the thing is actually now we are seeing a zooming in of the NATO pressure on Syria by taking one by one different steps in different directions in order to bring down the Syrian government, in order to put a lot of pressure on it and the other step was actually the taking down all those or calling all those ambassadors of the West allies and NATO countries to the respective countries. 

Children were deliberately targeted for value-added horror

This basically is a sign of putting more pressure on Damascus to give them certain concessions or to try to negotiate in favor of those. 

This unfortunately is also a brazen act of terrorism by their pro-Saudi, Wahhabi, pro-Israel and pro-American terrorist there and they are totally terrorists under international legal norms and human rights and humanitarian norms. 

Head-shots indicate deliberate targeting - no "accident"

So there is no question about it even at times we have seen that the United Nations has also taken up the same stance as thereof the Damascus government that those in the opposition are the terrorists resorting to violence and killing civilians and unarmed people. 

So this basically is sort of an astonishing alliance between the US, Israel, Saudi Arabia which is totally a US puppet there in that region, is how could they who are in the opposition in Syria could toe the line of Israel, Saudi Arabia and United States and then call for Islam or take the name of Islam? How could it happen? 

I mean Syria and on the other hand the Syrian government is a secular government based on the Ba'ath Party of formed and established in 1910 in Damascus by a Christian and a Jewish, Michel Alfaq. 

So how could the Western government try to pose this Syrian government as a threat to the Western interest when this government is a secular government?

Massacre obviously no help to Syrian government

So when we see a combination of the two opposing factions there, there is two opposing sides, that is the Western allies and there is NATO and Western powers with Israel and the United States on the one hand and on the other hand Saudi Arabia and the Wahhabis and others, the opposition Syrian forces on the other, how could they join hands with the Western powers? 

So if the Islamists are on the same side and sharing shoulder to shoulder the same burden and sharing the same interest with the Zionist and with the Americans, it means that there is something fishy out there and this is the moment when I think the Syrian people and those naïve Syrians who are not that aware of the international situation and the ideological standing behind these forces, they should know and should analyze the situation that they are being basically backed by pro-Zionist , pro Wahhabi, pro-American forces and they have been cheated and deceived in the name of Islam by those forces in Syria and they have nothing to do with their liberation, with their freedom or with their Islamic movements because these forces cannot have, you know on the one hand they can have a kind of an ally in the name of Satan, in the name of evil and they act in the name of Allah on the other hand. This cannot happen. 

Massacre was undertaken to frame Syrian troops

They cannot go hand in hand with Satan, with evil and with Allah. So they have to find and choose the right option that is to find the solution to this problem created by those Western allies, Israel and the Saudis there. 

So I think this is totally an act orchestrated by the Saudi intelligence, funded by the Israelis and of course the NATO forces there, the NATO countries there trying to manipulate the political situation. They are calling off the respective ambassadors back. 

U.S. State Department whores continue to lie, obfuscate on their role in massacre

And one thing more I want to point out here and I will be the first person to do that regarding Syria. 

Listen, as soon as you see that the Syrian government topples, if it topples in the future for instance then you will see the Eastern Saudi province, the Northern Yemeni province, the other countries will see a flare-up of those and Bahrain as well and you will see the armed guerrillas in those counties. 

AHK/HGH

This news bureau contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.  We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Read more »

Tony Blair Tells David Cameron And President Obama To Intervene In Syria

Despite his desperate, maniacal plan to start WWIII in Syria, the Obama criminals cannot possibly erase all the evidence of the CIA/FSA chemical weapons attacks using U.S./Qatar supplied munitions; war criminals Blair, Obama, Cameron will face justice in the Hague 

Huffington Post
08/27/2012

Tony Blair has demanded Britain and the United States intervene in the Syrian civil war, warning that the regime of Bashar al-Assad is launching an attack on civilians on a scale "not seen since the dark days of Saddam".

The former prime minister who led Britain to war in Iraq an Afghanistan said it was "time we took a side". Writing in The Times on Tuesday, Blair said: "People wince at the thought of intervention. But contemplate the future consequence of inaction and shudder."

He said: "Western policy is at a crossroads: commentary or action; shaping events or reacting to them. After the long and painful campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan, I understand every impulse to stay clear of the turmoil, to watch but not to intervene, to ratchet up language but not to engage in the hard, even harsh business of changing reality on the ground. But we have collectively to understand the consequences of wringing our hands instead of putting them to work."

Blair gets bogus "peace" medal from fellow war criminal Bush

In an apparent reference to Russian support for the regime, he added: "Others are taking sides. They’re not terrified of the prospect of intervention. They’re intervening. To support an assault on civilians not seen since the dark days of Saddam."

President Obama and David Cameron have raised expectations that the West is preparing to take military action against Assad - having accused him of using chemical weapons.

But there is nervousness in Westminster that the British government may take part in an air campaign before it is sanctioned by parliament - which does not return from summer recess until Monday. Cameron will decide today whether or not to recall MPs to the Commons early, potentially as soon as Wednesday.

The Labour Party has demanded that MPs be given a chance to voice their opinion on any military intervention. Ed Miliband has not yet set out a clear view on whether he would support air strikes.

Obama, UK, Qatar CIA/FSA mercs responsible for chemical attacks in Syria

 A substantial number of Conservative MPs are opposed to intervening in the conflict and have long insisted parliament be given the chance to veto any military moves.

Andrew Bridgen told The Huffington Post UK on Monday evening that he suspected a "large proportion" of Tory MPs remained to be convinced by the arguments for starting another "shooting war in the Middle East".

"We are fortunate we live a parliamentary democracy, not a dictatorship. Parliament should be recalled," he said. "I think it's for the foreign secretary and the prime minister to come to the Despatch Box and persuade the House of the need [for intervention]."

Americans will be held responsible by the international community for Obama's bombings, and had better be prepared for more of THIS

 

Earlier this year the North West Leicestershire MP organised a letter signed by 81 other Tories urging Cameron to grant a vote before any action was taken. 

In something of an understatement, Bridgen said given past assurances from the government that there would be a vote, the failure to hold one would provoke "consternation" among backbenchers.

His view was shared by Peterborough MP Stewart Jackson. The backbencher, who is also sceptical about the wisdom of intervention, told HuffPost UK: "I back a recall of parliament and there must be a debate and vote before any substantive UK involvement in the civil war."

Cameron is due to chair a meeting of the National Security Council (NSC) on Wednesday to discuss potential responses to the deadly attack after breaking off his family holiday in Cornwall to return to Downing Street. Nick Clegg has also cancelled a trip to Afghanistan to attend the meeting.

On Monday evening US secretary of state John Kerry said evidence of the use of chemical weapons was already "real and compelling" and indicated further evidence would be unveiled soon.

In an emotive address that ratcheted up the rhetoric against Assad, Kerry laid the blame for the attack at the feet of the regime and said it was a "moral obscenity" that "should shock the conscience of the world".

Soon after, White House press secretary Jay Carney told reporters there was "very little doubt that the Syrian regime is responsible for this attack" and that Obama was "assessing a potential response".

Carney said: "All of us who have seen the physical evidence are repulsed by it. Indiscriminate killing of innocent women and children in an attempt to maintain his bloody grip on power is despicable, but that's what we have come to expect from Bashar al-Assad."

In London, Downing Street said Cameron told Russian president Vladimir Putin on Monday that there was "little doubt that this was an attack carried out by the Syrian regime."

 

Any opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The 5^th Estate.

This news site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.  We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Read more »

McCain Says Obama Gave ‘Green Light’ to Syria to Use Chemical Weapons

Insane madman, former Obama bootlicker McCain now bites his master in the ass    

RYOT
By Jordan Burchette
08/27/2013

Unofficial Senate Hard-on-for-Syria Committee Chairman John McCain (R-AZ) blasted Obama and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey — the nation’s highest ranking military officer — for being big pussies in their handling of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

Spastic traitor McCain now betrays President Asswipe

In an exclusive interview with The Daily Beast, McCain referred to an August 19th letter written by Dempsey to the House Foreign Affairs Committee, in which the general advised against military involvement in Syria, as an embarrassment. McCain went further to suggest that it was Dempsey’s letter that emboldened the Assad regime to launch an alleged chemical weapons attack two days later without fear of reprisal.

Said McCain, “Dempsey made an incredible illogical statement and then a few days later we saw a massive use of chemical weapons… I’m sure that Bashar al-Assad paid attention to the top military man in America’s words that we were not going to get involved.”

Obama will follow in Hitler's footsteps

Earlier today, the Syrian government announced it would allow UN inspectors to examine the site of the attack that is being called the worst of its kind since Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein gassed more than 3,000 Kurds 25 years ago.

White House officials told NBC News, however, that “the move to let inspectors in may be too little, too late,” especially given President Obama’s rhetoric last year about a “red line” for US action regarding the use of chemical weapons. While the President didn’t specify what that action would be at the time, it’s become common wisdom that he essentially wrote a check back then that our military will have to cash now, a point echoed by Congressman Peter King (R-NY) on CNN’s OutFront last night.

But the frontrunner for most opportunistic turn of phrase goes to Senator McCain, who cleverly said of Obama’s halfhearted response to previous chemical weapons allegations, that the Assad regime “viewed that not as a red line but as a green light,” a quote that’s sure to sticker many a bumper during the next election cycle.

Following Obama's airstrike on Syria in an attempt to cover for CIA/FSA/Qatar chemical attacks Americans can look forward to more of THIS

 

RYOT NOTE:  Right now, we’re at the pushing, shoving and shit-talking stage that typically precedes a fistfight. That means mobilizing as much to Mercy Corps as it does our military. When the missiles start to fly, Mercy Corps provides vital services like shelter, food, medicine and counseling to Syrian refugees forced to flee their homes.

Any opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The 5^th Estate.

This news site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.  We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Read more »